Jump to content

theGozr

Members
  • Posts

    1986
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by theGozr

  1. I have a clean version of the DCS and as soon as I change my FOV ( Locking it to a much smaller number ) it doesn't allow me to enter into a pure server.. A solution would be to add the option to all modules like in the one of the "Mi-8MTV2" ( make sens )
  2. @SiThSpAwN Well then it is quite important to run it well.. Thanks for the answer but what about the Beta then not Alpha like the Beta 1.5.2 version are expecting a SLI and Xfire ??
  3. Oui je le conseil bien :)
  4. SLI Xfire news? this is quite real important.. new details on map .. wasn't suppose to be there from the get go ?
  5. Here a sample video. [ame] [/ame]
  6. Just in case if you are interested on some prettier goodies like in the video. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=113374&page=75
  7. Check here the Mirage 2K-C settings and Mod shade environment [ame] [/ame] This is what you get on flat screen good immersion. No going through seat.. tried to manege a mid range setting to satisfy a wide range of pilots with a more flat screen realism and with a practicality in a fight and this is what you get. The best so far.
  8. Yes standard and it's wrong period. If you see inside the seat while moving the head you are far to back.. at 60 FoV 30 40 or 120 you shouldn't.. But anyway lets see what they can come out of it .. and as long as they do not hard code the neck settings .. we are all good
  9. For a 3D modeler finding a blueprint for a cockpit is real hard.. real hard so lots is made by guessing from the artist point of view.. an artist that not necessary know the Track IR or VR or even fly on DCS is also another problem to find the right ratio. SO yeas all the feed back is good for them.
  10. No look down you seat and tell me where you are at >? I do understand that from start there is a problem and we are trying to accommodate this and we shouldn't really. The 60 is wrong from start to have a good 3D pit proportion.. but the seat placement is bad .. or maybe the dash board itself 3D angle is wrong.. Need more time to check things out
  11. Try this one.. ViewsMirage2K.rar
  12. The problem is not we are already too much far back.. I am against this.. Razbam added some kind of neck to it's vertical sight somewhere.. the eyes point is a bit wrong and the neck make it all bad. I've removed the horizontal setting and it's better. Now in an aircraft you wont be able to see from behind the seat and it's a very annoying DCS bad settings .. so far back is not the solution.. solution is simple.
  13. Huu! no one see this ? http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=157965
  14. Very very good but I wish for a simple gui to add all the typing make it simple.. good luck in adding all the lines.. Brain getting slow this days :)
  15. It's very simple but add a lot in immersion ;) A must keep.
  16. Better shade of the clouds and some distance ..
  17. Here some sample .. try it . More realistic and It is now such a pleasure :) Thank you Morpheus ;)
  18. :) Here a shot of Nevada.. with it.. So much more depth :) as it should. The pleasure to fly between the layers
  19. Humm I think it's not a bug but not designed .. :) but hopefully they will..
  20. .... I see so any news about dual controls ? this is what we are interested beside missions. ;)
×
×
  • Create New...