clawz

There is something wrong with the FM but unfortunately the community on these forums is apt to saying essentially "You suck, practice more" As of right now the best way to get the Gazelle under control is via heavy saturation changes to spread out the response over a longer throw instead of the mm sensitivity there is now. I touched on this in a response to Roie the other day and it can be seen in his video. He is able to throw his stick around heavily which implies major saturation and/or curve changes. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2762487&postcount=65 Massive saturation and curve changes are a bandaid fix to a larger problem. I'm sure Polychop can get it sorted out over time, just buyer beware at the moment.

Roie, If you are referring to Helipilot7's first impressions then I believe you need to take another look. He is type rated in a number of helicopters, not fixed wing. Being dismissive of the communities overall feeling (very twitchy and FM oddities) of your recently released module is a recipe for problems. I have watched over a number of your Oculus videos, along with Helipilot7's and there are some glaring differences between the two. First and foremost you either seem to have some very heavy curves in place or are using a different version of the FM when recording. Example is your newest video - [ame] [/ame] While you do not have the control indicator present in the recording you are able to throw your stick around and the Gazelle responds in a predictable manner. This is either "Easy Control", heavy curves or a different flight model at play when compared to the following; - From the second stream Helipilot7 did. Starts off trying to sort out the CG and moves onto showing some other FM oddities. - This segment is particularly telling. 1/3rd power pedal input and the Gazelle becomes a tornado. Once he blacks out and crashes then the air frame continues to spin like a top on the ground. Engine torque is a thing of course but the amount present is unrealistic and indicative of a flight model problem. I agree with other posters views that the Gazelle is going to have a transition time due to how much lighter it is than the other helos we have had access to in the past. Combine that with hardware and curve setting changes and there will be a vast number of things that could cause odd behavior but when a large part of the community is saying something is wrong, I would listen. Everyone has a right to their opinion, wrong or not but dismissing everyone but "real Gazelle pilots" is problematic at best. You may have consulted with them but mistakes can be made when converting them to 1's and 0's for sim usage. That said, you guys have put out a great first effort in the grand scheme of things. I can only hope that the dismissive nature of comments ends and that the energy is focused into continued development of the module to improve upon the foundation already laid.

Well there is through Combine Arms just not a simple method in the manner of fighter AA missile options now available in the ME. Hopefully it will come down the road.

This is something I have done for missions knowing its going to be a one and done type scenario. Issue currently is the amount of aircraft involved (15+) over a long period of time and at different times. Can likely do it with a combination of triggers but was hoping for a simpler streamlined solution that just took advantage of the built in CA options.

As the title suggests, is there any way to restrict SAM launch ranges outside of being a CA player? I went through all of the advanced waypoint options and roll out menus for air defense units with no luck finding any way to do this inside the ME. A method similar to the recent "Restrict AA Missile Range" option for fighters would be great. Would love to be able to access this without loading up the mission, hopping in a CA slot, configuring all the SAMs to limit launch ranges and then hopping back into an aircraft.

Lonewolf Callsign: clawz Side: Blue Preferred Aircraft: A-10C/UH-1/F15