Jump to content

tryphon77

Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tryphon77

  1. +1 Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  2. Yeah bogey-jammer i have the same concern ! I think the level of awesomeness will be equivalent...I hope! Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  3. Thx fir the heads up Prowler! Awesome piece of news !! Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  4. Looks like the cockpit ( on the startup video) is still sort of a placeholder without any definite texture. Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  5. So cool. Love it! Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  6. Thx for the pic Akatsuki ! (I unpluged from FB few weeks ago) Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
  7. Nice piece of news man. Where did you read that. Any chance they bought the 21 for further improvments?
  8. I would love To see the 17 too man. There is a lot to do with that aircraft. It is sad belsimtek elected to do the mig 15 instead...yeah I know the F86...but still. The mig 17 had a ton of engagements throughout different theatres.
  9. yes, that would make sense. I like it too. Considering the amazing job they did on the harrier i am not worried at all !!
  10. looks great!!! I just hope the textures will be finished up a lil' bit! It is gonna be a shit metric ton of fun to fly this bird !! Can't wait...
  11. Thx a lot for your guide btw
  12. Chuck you speak French ??? Tabernacle ça c'est une nouvelle !!!
  13. I would love to have a mig 17F. I would pay a million for it...seriously! Now my question since 2014 was why the hell did belsimtek developed the mig-15?? Yeah i know it pairs up better with the F-86 but the 17 would have been so much more interesting with a tons of interesting historic mission to realize with it... Still a fan of the mig-15 module though ;-)
  14. What a beautiful bird...You are making an amazing work Guys!! Keep it up :-) One quick picky question for Overstratos : Are you going to smooth out the lines of the rear canopy bow ? looks a little bit angular shaped. Sorry to bother you with that. It is just that i am a HUGE fan of mig 17 and 19 ;-) best regards,
  15. :thumbup: Thx for the tip Yurgon. I appreciate. Can't wait for this 2.5 thing now...
  16. Sorry in the first case i wanted to say : should i update 1.5.8 only then delete 2.2 OA folder supposed to have become a dead branch.
  17. sounds good Yurgon! I have 1.5.8 stable and 2.2 OA on different folders. Should i update them sepratly to 2.5 and then delete the duplicate 2.2 folders or should i have to, as recomended by USSR_rik, uninstall 2.2 OA beforehand and THEN Upgrade 1.5.8 to 2.5 stable via the updater ? It appears to me that it does not really matters but i really strive to save the most disk space during that transition and to get rid of the every duplicate files that i possibly can. Thx for your Help boys !
  18. Awesome chickenSim and Thx evryone for the explainations ! I'll check the NATOPS for further details. :-)
  19. It would make sens if it was Calibrated airspeed. But i think the airspeed in the HUD is Indicated airspeed as it is mentioned in the pocket guide page 44 and 46 (in the note). Where did you guys got the info that it was KCAS in the HUD ?
  20. Yes that is right. I was in NAV mode as you can see in the attachment. The Delta is between 15 to 20 knots. Pretty significant.
  21. Hi everyone, Really minor issue for me : my displayed HUD IAS doesn't match with IAS in the "ctrl+Y" bottom screen data bar. Have I missed something or do you guys have the same :huh:? Best regards,
  22. Thx Gabuzomeu !!
  23. Firmek, i love your post :lol:
  24. Still thinking this is a joke but... damn...so out of fun. If the real module is somewhat disappionting then they gonna be screwed for real ! For that specific episode of over-teasing at least. Huge fan of the mig21 since forever :-)
  25. Awesome !!!! Can't wait. This aircraft gonna be dope!
×
×
  • Create New...