sapsan2014

inspiring to hear that, I love my A-10C, but will wait until Mig-21 will go to DVD version, or if it will be too delayed will get it when it will come out from Beta. but it is true that DCS is best sim ever, i am totally shocked by new Su-27 PFM it is amazing how aircraft acts , if you compare it to Mig-29 SFM, Mig-29 is like UFO and i am looking forward to be impressed by Mig-21

ясно, вопрос по сушке, а что он так в плоски штопор впадает как мертвая рыба верх тармашками?и очень чувствителное управление это так должно быть?

а что значит чуть-чуть другая? поконкретнее можно? :) С? СК, СМ? СМ2 или что другое?

ясно, значет тут смоделирован Су-27СК? Спасибо

http://www.airwar.ru/other/bibl/su27sk_rle.html каторая версия Су-27 смоделирована тут? я нашел РЛЭ, это от него или другая версия?

http://www.airwar.ru/other/bibl/su27sk_rle.html

Is this a Su-27 S or Su-27SK modeled here I found this manual on the web , looks pretty nice but does not reflect the HUD and HDD modeled in FC3/DCS Flanker, anyone who know please comment , Thank you !

any news?

nice explanation thanks :) hope you are right :thumbup:

Yes I know that he is operating Pilot, but only because he is real pilot does not give this module status of super realistic flight model label. For me most important is what do virtual pilots think about it, as they are not biased( no offence though to developers). and truly will give most comprehensive and realistic opinion on how good is flight model and what is needed to be improved. So A-10 C is good one , but I was thinking that Mig should be way better then A-10C as technology and calculating powerof modern PC increased over 5 year period so developers should take advantage of that and developers more precise flight model , but maybe I am wrong :) share your opinion please

Thank you for response, sorry I it seems I did not make my self clear , by professional i mean opinion of Virtual pilots not developers:) I mean a lot of you spent plenty of time in large variety of flight sims I believe. starting from Janes f/a-18 , FSX, Lock on, Falcon BMS, Superbug, and Finally DCS, so It would not be difficult for you to spot scripted behavior of flight model . So what you are saying that flight model is pretty much realistic and avionics , radar performance is close to real. the question I am asking because I was confused on the forum that there were discussions saying that Mig was flying tail front and performing cobra ,etc, so I was thinking maybe there are a lot of mistakes in flight model and this was a bit depressing. and another interesting thing is when I put Mig-21 AI vs F-86 AI at same level , F-86 outperformed in Gunzo Mig-21 , is this real ?

Hi just would like to hear professional opinion on flight model and systems from people who knows Mig-21 well, as I have noticed there been a lot of bugs at the beginning of this module. How things are now in ver. 1.2.1.1 in terms of Flight model physics and finality of systems modeled in Mig-21. Is flight physics feels real authentic or still far away from reality ? the same on systems , radar, pumps. basically, is this on level of A-10 C or worse or better? Thank you beforehand for your opinion :)

Nice :) never deactivated any product yet , but still good to know :) Tank you!

and what does it give you if you will deactivate ? can not you just delete module? what is the benefit of deactivating module? will this replenish number of activation? lets say I have 5 activation left and if I will deactivate current module will it become 6 instead ? Thanks

no I talk about DCS version , tahnks anyway