Jump to content

med-taha

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by med-taha

  1. 14 minutes ago, raus said:
    • Why not making clear what is accessible?

    A lot of the controversy comes from not really knowing what is out of bounds. Then, why not publishing which documents are used as reference by the team? If they are open-source, as claimed, listing them for everyone interested to have a look would settle a lot of misunderstandings. We could have a look at the references upon which systems are modelled and that would save from reporting bugs that aren't such.

    This ^^^

    • Like 1
  2. 16 minutes ago, raus said:

    @BIGNEWY this is honestly disheartening. IIRC, when @Wags announced some viper HARM features, he was saying this level of simulation would be later coming to the Hornet. Also, I think we all understood the whole concept about things developed in the Hornet would make viper progress faster, would be a 2-way road, where eventually the Hornet would also benefit from viper development.

    Don't get me wrong: I have no problem with the EA scheme. I do have patience and understand things take time. But falling short on well known and documented features, that are even made available for another module feels wrong. Id have absolutely no issue if you were saying "I can't tell when will this feature come to the Hornet" or "It will still be a long way until we can put manpower back into Hornet to bring these kind of updates"... but just telling it will simply not happen, as it is no longer planned... well, bummer 😞

    I know the CM take flak whatever they announce, and that is impossible to keep everybody happy, but it feels that we do not get any update on what is yet to be expected for the Hornet, and neither on when could we expect anything. And, when we get an update, it is just to communicate things that won't be done... 

     

    This ^^^

    Amazing how things changed from « this level of simulation would be later coming to the Hornet » to « actually Not planned »

    • Like 5
  3. Hi,

    1 - The Radar Operating Status in the AZ/EL doesn't match the one in the RDR ATTK.

    2 - Turning the RADAR knob  (SENSOR PANEL) to STBY seems to turn the Operating Status to STBY only in the RDR ATTK PAGE.

    3- Pushing SIL in the RDR ATTK PAGE the Operating Status remains OPR

    Thanks

    OPS.png

  4. First I want to thank Ed for their hard work! keep it up guys!

    I saw in the video a problem with the slam-er separation at:

     

     

    I have already reported this bug cuz it affects the slam, harpoon and jsow . it seems like it affects all A/G missile section.

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. 45 minutes ago, Skysurfer said:

    Yeah currently it is implemented wrong (as per Wags' video) - the offset should be always screen centered and move the entire image with it, rather than just the cursor like a mouse on a computer. 

    +1

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  6. Hi,

     

    As the video is showing. the Slam and Jsow separation is wrong.

    for the slam, it behaves like if it was propelled forward by a rocket when pressing the weapon pickle and it's the same for a jsow but in this case it's propelled verticaly (down)

     

    logically it works like https://youtu.be/F-dSg3NSUEQ?t=22 

    Jsow video: https://youtu.be/qst15XrA5ts?t=28

     

    Thanks

     

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...