Hobel

As far as this aspect is concerned, both devices are not synchronized.

So you also have to enter it again in the Abriss

That's why I use the ingame tool or shark planner from @okopanja

I think it depends on which aspect of pre flare you mean. But in general, preflare has been working for a long time, even if you didn't see it in the cockpit before.

Here is an example:

This is when the IR missile on the rail didn't react to flare, but preflare still had an effect.
The missile here goes to flare which was thrown long before launch.
In the example, the atacker is slightly higher in the scene where the missile misses, but the distance and flare program was always the same. That alone shows that the aspect already has a big influence and I don't really move much.

But maybe I can make a clean example, but according to my observation and the tests it has a clear effect if the flare is between the airplane and the seeker and on top of that there are still many flares in the FOV of the seeker, so you should make sure to throw the flare in the direction of the seeker so that it fills the FOV as long as possible.

This was also confirmed by a dev that this has an effect

I could perhaps test it even better with the AV8 because i can control the direction where the flare is throw and the plane can stay perfectly straight.

This has been reported since the PB, EOM and RUK modes were released.
the harm goes active too early, which causes this behavior.
actually it should be 20nm before the TGT Point with RUK
PB 10-15nm
and EOM 5-10nm
but this is not the case i think it is always 40nm before the target and the footprint is always too big

An emitter is an emitter.
The AGM-88 can also recognise aircraft radars.
At most, one could discuss whether the frequencies are correct.
 
 

It would be nice if this could at least be done in DCS.😄
 
 
In this video you can see very nicely how wings are cut off.
On the one hand, through explosions, as you already said.
But you can also see some sections caused by 50cals without explosions.
because in these places there is nothing that could explode. 🙂
https://streamable.com/bq1lwm
 

Yes. it does what you expect.

There is only a start warning for STT. Otherwise not.

in Short This thing will be fully OP
Basically, the zoom and possibly the resolution will be much better and other functions that are still missing in the current TGP will be further developed.
But the feature that differs the most could be the multi-target track up to 10 targets at the same time, basically similar to the Apache and the Tads where there are fewer.
these are basic functions that the Sniper in the irl F-16 has.

What you want is done with ccrp.  There are many irl shots of the HUD, you can see how the pilots use ccrp to approach the target, just before the target the pilots press NWS to quickly switch from ccrp to ccip

 
 
 

Fixed 🙂

I will test it again but in the last test the airburst against infantry has 20m more aoe with mk82

Love it 😄
 
 

azimuth has no effect on DBS1-2, this used to work but has been fixed.
 
https://forum.dcs.world/topic/302912-strange-ground-radar-behaviour-while-zooming-in/

Yes, there are a few changes.   There are also a few open reports. I'll look them up and post them here as well as the changes.
Edit:
So far the A/G radar seems to work, but the thing that makes it most difficult to use is the "snapback" of the cursor every time you put it down, the whole image is reset, which makes it almost impossible to use.

good to see here once IRL and once DCS
 
 
 

There are already some reports on the AGM-88 and its behavior, basically the AGM-88 goes active almost immediately after start in all modes, which can lead to discrepancies.
 
https://forum.dcs.world/topic/327388-harm-in-pos-modes-goes-active-too-early-ruk-eom-and-pb/#comment-5234184

You are in "MAN" mode, so I don't know exactly how to get the Igla to a target in this mode.
Switch to "Auto" and it should work

That is normal.
How is the FCR supposed to know whether a vehicle has been destroyed?
Pay attention to the green X that appears on which targets you have already shot a Missle to avoid double shots, if you want to be sure if a target has been destroyed you have to visually  see it

Has this always been the case or has the behavior changed after 2.9?  
  
Are you suggesting that the missle warning provocates a faster INU drift?

and btw
Fast Aligment is not intended for combat use, therefore strong drifts are to be expected after a short time, especially with stronger maneuvers over +15 bank.
herefore Norm or Prec is necessary especially if you want to use Datalink and similar precisely.



nevertheless I will have another look at it, you never know, otherwise you can upload a track of your situation.

Ah you have selected the Air Mode of the Missle which activates the Proxy Fuze and the missile explodes in front of the target, on a tank these fragments do no damage of course.
This button must not be activated
this one:

 

TV Mav no
IR MAV Yes

Basically no, the AGM-88C has a rough INS which is not enough for pinpoint attacks. Although it flies in the direction of the target point, it can still fly a few hundred meters or even km away from the actual waypoint as long as there is no emitter nearby
 
  
this is Reported

only when the missle goes active and this happens when it is still 15km away from the target

As far as I know this is correct, EWR work in an Band that is not recognized by our AGM88 or even HTS.
here is also discussed about it
 
 
 

This is not quite true, this behavior was changed some times ago even months ago.
And therefore my tests are already a bit behind.
With certainty I can say that the apache has 15km range.
In tests with the f16, I was able to observe 14-17nm at the time.
 

Tacview-20230515-231358-DCS.zip.acmi