M460

Count me in!

+1 :thumbup:

Jtac is player controllable on both teams. Its the only ground unit you can jump on. Please enable our Datalink at least for testing. We mostly dont have the numbers to afford a CGI.

We can disagree, but we cannot miss out the facts, because your KA-50 is already the A-10C, and we don't have it. AI fighters Don't spawn for FARPS, COMMS or cities, thats more than 50% of all objectives that the Gazelle can take out effortless by itself. For us to at least call a bomber requires hopping onto an L-29 from some weird corner the map fly it for decades without an RWR and that's a job even the hawk does better. So No, its not OK having that outstanding capability on just one side...:smilewink:

The gazelle breaks the rules of cooperation to capture thus it can do it all by itself. Ka-50 cannot carry troops or crates...or call bombers.. the gazelle can do all of those and uses chopper lives..not fighter lives like the KA-50. No point comparing these two.

Thank you for the juicy update Greg!! Still what about the Gazelle. We need to split some variants too.. It still does to much to be just on one side.

I disagree, its more than Plausible.. In reality Russians get shot by AK-47, Sa3's, Bombed by Su-25 and intercepted by Migs The US Has been engaged by their own hardware too... I did not mention f15 -a10 and su27 sharing because its not plausible so keep that in mind. My point is reality lies beyond alliances and paper work, and since this is a game, it should be one we can all enjoy. Not just one side because of a color grabbing onto all capabilities.

So the Viggen shouldn´t be on blueflag either because its OOS. Also Tell that to Ukraine Mig 29 then :megalol:

Serbia mayd act as a Redfor coountry i guess.. but you can rely on - Syria - Irak - Egypt - India Who operate gazelles to name a few NATO best buddies.. Just like - Iran - Lybia - Sudan - Yemen - Venezuela Operate the F-5. Other modules like the L-39 from the Georgian airforce Mig 29G(Germany)/A(SLovakia) should be added to BlUEFOR too.. :thumbup:

SR is a wonderful development and I do thank Ciribob for the effort put into it. Being able to use the actual module radios is super cool and adds realism to this game across the board. It does have something that bothers me and that is that you cannot manage others volume levels. Some people will gate(Are too loud) and that is something that should be managed locally. Instead of asking the guy screaming to lower their MIC gain. That´s my 2 cents. BTW... REDFOR 2017 questions: Where´s my Datalink? Where´s my Chopper that can call bombers, carry crates, and troops at once?

Be patient for Friday release. No point for such request my friend. :smilewink:

Leavu can still be used, it has a workaround and it has been confirmed. please stop deceiving on this forum.

Datalink is a native capability on the su-27 and su-33(just like the a-10 but not restricted right?). Leavu isn't a DCS f15 capability, i'm not being sarcastic. We are tired being 3 crazy neutered goats so you guy can have fun, cause its back to AIM120s.

Can we please focus on REDFOR getting Datalink?

I'm not blaming RVE for anything here... I was just reminding Duffy who played for red team on the event he speaks about. Is it so hard to keep an honest conversation about what has been left out?

I dont know who you're trying to fool there...but. Your red team taking over the map was... RVE crew testing for RED until PAK 6 wall hit a nerve...

Thank you for the reminder Oceandar, I not only know that, but I also understand the extent of my petition. Its because there is none of the above mentioned...I'm asking for our native capabilities to be present in the absence of players to support our operations. 3 vs 1 average ratio 24/7 gets a bit frustrating, Give us our options, I'm just saying.

Do I have to call for Datalink and the Su-33 for some leverage here? seems no one wants to fly on red team. Data link also works with EWR for what i heard. so no AWACS are required. The flight model on the SU-33 is not very different than flying the MIG-29. Having the radar that works and some extra hard points would help out.

Will russia attempt a salvage on those 2 lost aircraft? If not, then 2 new treasures lie on the Mediterranean floor. ARFF!!

Both AI gunners work fine for me! Noticed you cannot open the rear Bay door and the side door when gunners are equipped. Is there going to be an animation added in the future for this?

I would suggest you make a full rundown on how transports are distributed around airfields vs FARPS. Once you realize you have never had transport gazelles at Airfields you wont be missing them at a platonic level. RedFor has been struggling with two MI-8 at most frontline airbases for many rounds now. Due to the shorter range in between your native airfields we achieve parity.

So now that BlueFor gets the MI-8 too, Gazelles should not transport troops. Right?

At my Usual cruise speed between 250 and 270kph at 50mts. Try the same test with Gazelle and UH-1h which would be the correct type of chopper EOS systems will look for on BF. Keep in mind - I hardly ever use full collective and would discourage using it on the MI-8 that barely needs 45% of its power. Any aircraft or chopper at max regime will create a large IR signature the EOS will pick up no exceptions here. even at lets say 60km an F-15 AFT will show on HUD which is well beyond the scan range on this system..

I did some testing on the F-15 againt helos. God radar had no issues spotting mi8 at 30 mles. No luck with the IRST at that range head-on. Would like to know.. why REDFOR is still bound to 4 helos(2 attack 2 transport) at FARPs which make up to 24 lives, while BLUEFOR Get 64 lives (6 transport 2 attack)at every FARP. Are we supposed to bring reinforcements from Moscow to defend farps?