Jump to content

SwedishWaffle

Members
  • Posts

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SwedishWaffle

  1. If I read the patchnotes correctly, the fishbed's damage model should be fixed now. That means this guy won't out turn me anymore. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  2. My point was that they shouldn't have released it in this state when they promised a finished module that clearly isn't. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  3. If there's this much wrong with it then it isn't a finished product. All those you mentioned (aside from the mig-21 which i agree is broken) are in early access. The farmer was never supposed to be. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  4. So much for a finished product Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  5. >Be me >Be flying the harrier on ossetia >Arm up with a ****ton of bombs and fuel >Taxi out >Take off and almost pop tyres because 99% of MTOW >Lumber over towards wp1 >15 minutes later. Finally begin setting up attack >*Server rotates in 1 minute* FML Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  6. Is the server down? Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  7. I disagree. I've had several cases where I've been able to keep my flight path marker right on the mig-19 but been too close for missiles. I really wish there was an internal gun... The mig-21 is tougher, in my opinion, since it can more or less keep up in the vertical
  8. anyone else think the fishbed's damage model is totally broken again?
  9. the server crashed
  10. Yes Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  11. Can you move the blue and red ground forces on five points further apart? Friendly fire is far too common right now. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  12. I can see it now!!! Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  13. Can't be. I don't have SRS atm and I can't connect. I could connect yesterday, though. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  14. Disappointed that we didn't get those videos hat you promised Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  15. At long last, I have a new computer. Get ready, mig drivers, I'm coming for ya! Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  16. Draken AI? Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  17. Forcing people to use srs because srs is sometimes quiet is the wrong way to go about things Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  18. No, but it can detect "objects" but can't identify them. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  19. It is, though, partly Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  20. An entirely feasible thing Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  21. It's meant for naval search and terrain mapping, which is a feature used both for navigation and weapons employment. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  22. It's what the radar's meant to be used for. And even if it were hard to do, the BK90 first entered service after the cold war ended so it doesn't belong anyway. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  23. The BK90 is actually very simple to use. You can just move the target waypoint onto the targets using radar. It also uses a radar altimeter so QFE is irrelevant. Furthermore, it's a post cold war weapon. For viggen, keep the RB05 and RB04. If you want to allow mavericks on some missions, only allow the RB75. The RB75T carries a bigger warhead and the RB75B is a fictional variant with increased zoom and resolution only there to help VR players. For the A-10, only allow the AGM-65H. This is the worst-performing maverick available. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  24. If you want my opinion, I say remove all mavericks and GBUs, and the RB15. Keep only the grom, RB05, and RB04 for guided weapons. Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
  25. What kind of weapons restrictions are we talking about here? Rear aspect ir missiles only? Dumb weapons only? Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...