TOViper
-
Posts
2498 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by TOViper
-
-
I am saying this since years.
Then all the "it must be 1:1 the real aircraft, otherwise DCS world and the whole world itself will crash down - nogo - never argumenters" fall over the forum and Discord in destroying the idea with their infinite wisdom. That really became boring.
It is a wonderful idea, and I really would love to fly it. At least FC level, but better of course in a more detailed level.-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, jdmsweden96 said:
Haha woops!
As Edge from U2 would say: A long delay ...
-
Cool, thanks for sharing this!
-
7 hours ago, virgo47 said:
Cargo. Internal cargo support added for UH-1H, Mi-8 and Mi-24P What exactly does this mean? Is it related to this thread?
Open up the comms menu, open Ground Crew ... , select Rearm & Refuel. Then in the lower left lower corner of the GUI you see the Cargo button for loading, and on the right lower corner of the GUI you see the Cargo button unloading, considering you are in the vicinity of cargos (Static objects -> Cargos).
-
1
-
3
-
-
This report confirms my observations with the use of A2A TACAN function, which wasn't working in MP in the Phantom during one of my latest flights.
My aircraft was F-4 with me as pilot and another player as WSO. Other aircraft was a F-14, human controlled pilot and Jester as RIO. We weren't able to get it work, even after 10 minutes of struggling around with that, and finally being shot down because 3 heads were totally stuck in the cockpit finally finding out it didn't work ...
-
1
-
-
After you pressed both pedals, and pulled the parking brake handle, are you releasing the brake pedals at the same time? If they are not released together and evenly, the parking brake will not engage.
-
1
-
-
So then it will make you smile hearing that the next version of the RC2.1. is more printer friendly than the older ones ...
-
1
-
2
-
-
Corrected, thank you Dobbi!
-
2
-
1
-
-
Updatelog:
2025-07-250, 20:50 UTC
==================Dear Viggen pilots!
Please be aware that the Eternal list of the best will now use a new calculation scheme:
- Pre-Entry Check category "A" (basic knowledge): max 50 points possible
- Pre-Entry Check category "B" (extended knowledge): max 100 points possible
- Exam category "A" (basic knowledge): max 200 points possible
- Exam category "B" (extended knowledge): max 400 points possible
The current database was updated accordingly, and therefore we have a new ranking.
Kind regards & happy examining!
TOViper-
1
-
Okay, this is good news.
-
-
On 4/19/2025 at 11:59 PM, Snuten said:
I flew Viggen today after the update and when reaching a speed over 0.8-0.9 I could not pull her up from a dive and crashed into the ground.
If you were "over 0.8-0.9" (e.g. M0.92) you could have probably reached the "uttagbar lastfactor" of 3.8g.
Do you have a track to review your exact airspeed?
10 hours ago, arkady86 said:I'll let you imagine how fun it is when you're flying slot in a 4ship doing aerobatics...
You would not fly a fourship aerobatic with M0.92, more M0.4 to M0.7 ish.
-
7 hours ago, scommander2 said:
I guess DCS is not natively supported by Nvidia, right?
There is a profile for it, which is called "Digital Combat Simulator: Black Shark".
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Retnek said:
To me it contains a message: Dear reader, ignore the light grey parts because that's "w.i.p." It will become readable when the feature is finalised.
That's what it is supposed to do, yes
It worked in the past, and no one knows when it will ever work again. -
-
1
-
-
Regarding 2.) According to another post somewhere in this forum done by Myse1234, the pod when its loaded to the aircraft its always full of chaffs and full of flares, and the option to change the slider was removed intentionally.
Regarding 1.) maybe @MYSE1234 knows more, since this is coding stuff. -
Sent an email, let's see if something magic happens
-
2
-
1
-
-
Hey SharpeXP, can you provide the TRK file of this certain flight?
Otherwise, it could be that the SLATS & FLAPS switch was set to position "SLATS out" but not "SLATS out & FLAPS down".
This happened to a user who reported the same "bug" a few months earlier. In fact it was no bug, he just simply did not perform the step right. -
Updatelog 2025-06-12, 00:00 UTC
=========================
Training Flight M190-23-0 / STARTUP:
.) Step 31 (HÖJD CISI switch) is now correctly expected to be in position "LD" in order to continue with the procedure.Happy switching!
TOViper
-
3
-
-
What this building makes it special is that the streets are going through below it (I never have seen this in DCS before Kola).
Maybe it has to do with the crash detection(routines-code) of the particular aircraft you mentioned? I could imagine this, because the crash detection now sees an object inbetween the ground and the aircraft outlines ...
-
1
-
-
Updatelog: 2025-06-05, 00:30 UTC
=========================Training flight M190-91 / Simulator Introduction:
.) The audio is now English instead of Swedish, but it is still using the same speaker in order to facilitate the typical Swedish accent.
.) The explanation of the Altitude Warning System is now extended with content from RC2.1 page 168.
.) The data cartridge loading procedure on the data panel is now supported by the use of highlights.
.) A picture showing the cockpit panels from RC2.1 page 21 has been replaced by a newer versionTraining flight M190-21-2 / Checklists:
.) The theoretical knowledge requirements regarding the Altitude Warning System have been extended by RC2.1 page 168.Self study lesson M190-22 / SI:
.) A video has been added to the list of Learning material.Section Training Office > Theoretical knowledge training:
.) A video playlist has been added to the list of VIDEO SUPPORT.Happy learning!
TOViper
-
1
-
2
-
-
Major²: OpenXR Toolkit (I don't know what I would do without the Toolkit when flying in VR; without the tool DCS is just a messy-ugly-awful terrain stuttering thing)
Often: Buddy Spike MP scenarios and COOP Server scenarios.
Sometimes: SRS
Rarely: A-4E
Seldomly: VAICOM ProThat's it.
-
On 5/6/2025 at 1:36 AM, NineLine said:
This has been like this for a long time; zooming in on them makes it much worse. I will see if there are any plans to improve, or if it can be improved without crushing performance.
Hello Nineline,
maybe tweaking this setting might help users to limit the draw distance in mirrors while the resolution setting for displays is set to 1024 or 1024 each frame, which should help a lot with performance if you consider increasing the number 2048 or higher values (I think its some kind of detail setting for such displays/mirrors)
-
Dear guys at ED,
please make the far_clip setting work in section CameraMirrors, like that:
CameraMirrors = { Low = { thisIsMirror = true; near_clip = 0.02; far_clip = 10000;Currently, DCS is not taking care of that setting for mirrors.
Here are two screenshots:
The scene in the normal view (1) doesn't show them correctly (caused by a far_clip setting of 30000), but the mirror (2) shows the rocks SW of Kobuleti.
(1)
(2)
Thank you!!
TOViper
Update ideas.
in DCS: AJS37 Viggen
Posted · Edited by TOViper
What I see right now is that FC aircraft like F-15C are still used on the servers which I am currently flying.
Radar modes in the FC F-15C e.g. are for sure not as "detailed and correct" as in the real F-15C.
So there is already a difference, but people still love to fly the FC F-15C, including my buddies and myself.
I am sure there are people available in Sweden to help getting the basic radar modes working in a sort of FC-level JA37, but it seems no one is really willing to dig into.
"Also, I think a too simplified JA 37 would lose some of the stuff that makes the JA 37 interesting, like the autopilot assisted gun mode."
I think so too, not only because of one certain missing thing, but it could happen during the course of the journey that the information becomes somehow "known".