Jump to content

3Sqn_TomAce

Members
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 3Sqn_TomAce

  1. I did Mustang was like wow how did this happen, now I know.
  2. Replays "trk" are messed also, seen Client AC taxi at -10 feet and not follow their real in game path at sochi.
  3. Did you hit two AC mid air? how'd you lose both wings and not damage any other part of the Eagle with only one hit?
  4. 3Sqn like FC2.0 and give a big thumbs up so thanks again, two main things that we have picked up are: * Tally issues WVR seems far to hard to see jets 1.5 mile + * Notch seems far to effective on A/C radar we've seen contacts disappear from 60deg aspect
  5. Moved to sticky bug thread
  6. Awesome news guys thanks.... Yes no more LA'd over ranged ET's
  7. Footage from the RAF guns only server?
  8. Very nice, all monitors linked via display port?
  9. What device are you using to run the 3 screens? triple head to go or a new ATI card?
  10. How many in the community use "radar automization" like target stepping not the auto features of standard LRM ?
  11. Yoda do you plan to enable tdc snap locking given target information coming from the link system?
  12. As a mod should you not be neutral? Everyone ask youself a question: what makes you come to Lomac and more importantly what makes you leave angry, not wanting to come back?
  13. Yoda what port and protocol does the link system run on? And agree with Case that's the core of the issue!
  14. A user installable client that adjusts export.lua file name/folder name/ or replaces the file every xx seconds with blank copy, the client handshakes with the server when Lomac loads otherwise a kick command is initiated on the server using tools already built by Yoda/others. This wouldn't be 100% but would be a start. I'm sure we have talented I.T. people in the community who can Help Yoda and GG make this mod even better by coming up with a solution to this key issue better then I can so flow with the knowledge pilots please.
  15. No doubt this will add to the package in FC2.0, Having said that if it can not be controlled "allow/deny server side" I will have to consider even purchasing FC2.0 as it will be a cluster "F" before it even starts. ED consider this carefully as this could potentially hurt your revenue, who wants to purchase a new product with the old exporting issues we consider "unfair advantage" ? A fair on-line experience is key for any sim/game ?
  16. Agree with locking it down as much as possible the less hacks / scripts that are allowed to run the better IMOP.
  17. Awesome we've been waiting and now it's here, you'll get my upgrade fee no problems cheers!
  18. www.3sqn.com Oz, US, Italy all welcome
×
×
  • Create New...