MiGCap1

I understand Your preference.

Gee, what a <profanity>storm! And only for a post marked as personal opinion … Are You taking the whole thing a little bit too serously perhaps? After all, DCS is only a game. But I stay to my opinion: It would make more sense to deliver the 104 before finishing just another F.1 version. There are already three (?) variants of the F.1 flyable for the fans, but no 104.

You're so right! I also fly only VR. But for me the pilot in the cockpit is the immersion breaker, it looks crude and distracts me and also do not respond to my arm movements so that parts of the cockpit are covered. I never realised that the MiG-21 has no pilot body ...

So sorry, but I am not a F.1 fanboy, actually I didn't even like it in RL. As I said, my personal opinion. And I stick with it. The F.1 was not a jet as widely used as the F-104. So for me it is bad news that the development of the Starfighter module was put behind. That's all.

Most modules in DCS are unfinished - so what … The F-104 will attract much more buyers than the F.1. So I would concentrate on the module which is more promising in sales. My opinion.

Bad news and bad decision. The F-104G would be an ideal addition to the new CW Germany map and it would for sure draw many buyers just because of the map.

And it looks great at night!

Pimax Crystal Standard, Plain vanilla 3090, all settings max except for MSAA: 35 FPS over Berlin ...

Replay track: After successful landings the tail gear collapses and the rudder falls off while taxiing back to parking slot. And sometimes in the game one gear is not retracted after take-off even as it was shown in the cockpit as in. Have to check via F2 always. Looks like these anomalys came with the landing gear upgrade. Please repair.