Jump to content

Recoil16

ED Beta Testers
  • Posts

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Community Answers

  1. Recoil16's post in P-14 Tall King radar - v 1.01 was marked as the answer   
    @tripod3
    Line 60 of sensors.lua should read
    declare_sensor(TALL_KING) it currently reads
    declare_sensor(BAR_LOCK) Due to this small error, the radar does not actually properly detect targets, as it has no valid sensor.
  2. Recoil16's post in Can not set the Vaziani VHF AM frequency. was marked as the answer   
    This is not a bug. FM should be the default state between 136.0 and 155.975, see page 34 of MIL-R-29583 (of 1 July 1992, Approved for public release; distribution unlimited, LINK), the specification for the ARC-210 (relevant excerpt below).

    You can just use the AM/FM button on the radio control head to switch to AM.
  3. Recoil16's post in Navigation aid systems missing or wrong data was marked as the answer   
    I'm showing the JSK NDB exactly where it's supposed to be.
     
    What you are pointing out on the map there is the Kish VOR/DME which is on channel 121X (117.4) in game as it should be. The Kish TACAN is on channel 112X irl and in game (see OIBK AD 2.19 in the AIP Iran).
     
    What you are pointing out there on the map is the Lar  DVOR/DME which is on channel 126X (117.9) in game as it should be. Lar does not have a TACAN (per OISL AD 2.19 in the AIP Iran).
     
    What you are pointing out there is the Queshm NDB/DME, an NDB co-located with a DME. Ingame we have an NDB co-located with a VOR/DME (on channel 118X/117.1), which is actually more than IRL (this is the only actual problem out of the four you pointed out). Queshm does not have a TACAN (see OIKQ AD 2.19 in the AIP Iran).
     
    While I agree with you that there are aeronautical issues with the PG map, what you specifically pointed out here are not issues save for the Qeshm VOR/DME which actually should just be a DME.
  4. Recoil16's post in Ras Al Khaimah (OMRK) VOR Location on DCS map is way off. was marked as the answer   
    It's not. It is located where it is supposed to be, within about 100ft (which could be better, but definitely isn't "way off"). The only problem with it is that its identifier is currently "OMRK" when it should be "RAV", which is already reported though.

    See attached screenshot from the ME and compare with the aerodrome chart from the UAE AIP: https://www.gcaa.gov.ae/aip/current/AIRACs/2021-P08/graphics/OMRK-AD-2-21_2020-13.pdf

  5. Recoil16's post in Intercom control panel: is it correct? was marked as the answer   
    Correct as is. In is off. Out is on.
×
×
  • Create New...