Hippo

My "mission" would be to try and help to identify what might be causing the issue. My secondary objective would be to inform whoever is looking into it that it isn't happening to everyone. I am certainly not engaged in a campaign to annoy anyone. Over and out.

Thanks. I don't doubt it's happening to you and to others, but it's certainly not happening to me. Perhaps you could post your DCS settings and I can try them on my system (although I won't be able to for at least two weeks, as I'm away)?

I am able to use in it VR (pretty much) without issue, see my posts above.

I can't say for sure as I haven't tried it, but a quick AI-assisted search gives me: I suspect that the DLAA under DLSS v4 will give a better quality image than DLAA under DLSS v3, but at the cost of a performance hit (and more so on older generation nvidia GPUs). I did try DLSS under DLSS v4 on my 3080 Ti and I would say that performance was the same or worse than DLAA under DLSS v3, so I didn't even think to try DLSS v4 DLAA. Also, (any) DLSS + QVFR = too much shimmering in the periphery for me in my Quest Pro; so for now I'm sticking with DLAA, under DLSS v3. (And NVIDIA could sure help avoid confusion if they put a bit more thought into the way they name these things).

the original frame generation (i.e. x2 only) is supported by 40 series (and up I suppose), the new dlss 4 multi frame generation (x2, x3 or x4) is 50 series only. But neither FG tech is usable in DCS VR (or any VR title) as I understand it (and I assume this is what you mean since this is the VR forum). I have no idea if it can be made to work in 2D DCS.

Well it was a solution in the sense that you answered my question. I take your point though and have removed your shiny green badge.

My Link slider maxes out at 1.3 (5408 x 2752). Is that what you meant? How much is "a bit"? I'm sorry if I appear combative, I don't mean to. I'm just trying to work out what your results would mean for me and the way I like to set things up, and those details matter. Thank you for your posts, which I believe are genuine, and for your time and patience. P.S. Where, at my local store that also stocks unicorns? Consider yourself very, very fortunate if you managed to buy a 5090 through normal channels.

Alternatively, you can run with reprojection, fly at 30,000 ft over the sea and post YT videos demonstrating how you can a run a Pimax Crystal Super on a 4070 no worries... Please could you post the QVFR settings you're using for QP, and which AA you're using?

Thanks, I did try a search, but clearly with not enough determination.

I don't know if it's just me but if I assign some of the newer callsigns, e.g. "squid" or "ragin", to flights, although the name can be seen in the subtitles for radio calls it is not heard, as if the audio file doesn't exist. E.g. "squid one" will only be heard as "one", whereas the older callsigns e.g. "enfield one" are played in their entirety.

I think you might need to reevaluate your priorities. I would suggest: DCS -> family -> work. ()

Pots, kettles...? I might more diplomatically suggest that T_A could better support his results by posting his DCS settings and testing methodology. And I'm rather more concerned about his activities with goats. At least he hasn't gone with my own pet peeve of a contextless "that 5090 is awesome, I now get 10 more fps", which is far more common than it should be. Selfishly, I might even suggest that he could replicate my test and post graphs of gpu util + frame rate + frame time just for for me.

A bit of a blanket statement there. I have a 3080Ti, what would you recommend I buy? 4090s are virtually unavailable and extremely expensive. It'll be two years until the next gen. 5080 or anything below not enough of an increase to be worth bothering with. I will probably wait around six months and hope for 5090 supply and prices to stabilise. For consistency, shouldn't you say that it beat the 3090 Ti by 70%? Or that the 5090 performs at 121% the rate of the 4090? Otherwise you run the risk of appearing to present numbers in a way that supports a particular narrative. Thank you for your post and the performance numbers on VR headsets, very informative. It's nice to finally see 5090 perf numbers for DCS / VR.

... and just to add to the confusion, I added fog (4560 ft vis, 1000 ft "thickness", sorry for terrible vr screenshot) to the mission I posted above and the iflols became visible from over 3 miles away (vs 1.6 miles with no fog). null

It seems unusual that while the group window can be moved the advanced waypoint actions window cannot. Please could it be made movable by the user or dock and move with the main group window (or both). Thanks