TBarina

I'd love to see ED and its partners offer a paid upgrade version of some modules for customers interested in funding the resolution of immersion-breaking issues or encouraging the introduction of new features. A list of potential modules and a customer survey would be helpful. Most of the upgrades would certainly be a success (ATC, Dynamic Campaigns, Terrain improvements). Let's be clear. I'm not saying what's been done so far isn't good, of course. Excellent modules have been produced so far, and ED has delivered on all its promises over time and beyond (see F18, F16, A10, Wardbirds, the fantastic Supercarrier module, the weather system, etc.). However, in my opinion, there are areas that need a boost.

I'm afraid too! I ceased buying modules in fact. Each new one introduces tons of issues that I'll will never see fixed. All of them (ED, UgraMedia, & co.) had better propose a payware enhanced version of their modules for those customers interested in financing fixing those issues instead of releasing tons of new aircrafts and terrains. Surely most enhanced versions would be a hit (ATC, Dynamic Campaigns, Terrain enhancements). I'm not saying that ED is not doing well, of course. So far they have produced great modules and have fullfil promises (see F18, F16, A10, Wardbirds, the great Supercarrier module, weather system, etc.). However, in my opinion, there are areas that need a boost.

Has this been fixed?

if ED continues to postpone terrain, ATC and AI bug fixes (not to mention dynamic campaign) I think we will have an Early Access in a decent time

There are issues that have been reported but not answered so far. Who is in charge of it? Could someone at least provide some answer? Many thanks in advance.

I agree with you. Unfortunately I bought it but I'm not going go buy anything more until they fix (or at least give answers to) the various bugs reported so far.

Don't know why but nobody is taking into accounts these bugs. Is anybody at ED able to answer?

So far no answer from Maestro

Once again: I'm only posting here my opinion about how long are these posts and also how long the list of bugs is becoming. I'm not here to discuss the bugs in details and I'm not paid for discovering bugs. It's up to the dev team and beta-tester to do that. We are paying (and paying a lot) for buying products that are supposed to work or to be amended in a reasoneable time (not in years).

Let me express my humble opinion. Personally I'm a little surprised and a little worried. I fear that we are distracted (or led astray) by too many sometimes useless novelties. There are dozens of messages/posts commenting on insignificant details for a military flight simulator and almost none that support discussions on essential points such as ATC communicating wrong approaches to runways. Staying on graphical details, there are also significant errors in UgraMedia's maps, such as bridges lying on train tracks or shelters invading the tracks in stations. Don't get me wrong. I love DCS but the more you put in the fire the more bugs are left behind and it becomes difficult to manage and fix them. Honestly I would rather pay something to buy an enhancement that fixes the bugs still in circulation before moving on to new scenarios, planes and features.

I've added a mission with a flight in the proximity of the airports. Aircraft is in the air and radios have been set to contact three different airports in the zone (mainly: HighHalden and HeadCorn. Wind is set so the a user can quickly test calling different airports and check responses. IMHO this is better than a track to check ATC messages.

Seems like nobody cares for testing bugs.

12 months to solve! Very reactive...

It's even worse at High Halden or other two airstrips fields when asking direction to final or inbound. You are often directed to the opposite IAF instead to the the proper one according to the radio message inditecating the the runway number. Unfortunately, IMHO, ED is fully concentrated to release new modules and doesn't care for the bugs they leave behind. It's a great sim indeed and it would deserve greater respect and attention.

Anyone has had the chance to test?