Jump to content

Aviators

Members
  • Posts

    1602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Aviators

  1. Quote

    Important announcement:
    Unfortunately, we are forced to cancel the mission scheduled for Monday evening due to reasons beyond our control.
    The campaign will be put on hold until further notice.
    Personally, I'm really sorry: I would have loved to fly with you at least once!
    Thank you all from the bottom of my heart for the commitment, passion, and the great evenings we shared.

     

  2. 44 minutes ago, Nachtfalke said:

    Ich freue mich sher auf diese Karte , allerings verstehe ich nicht,  warum  der ganze Süddeutsche Raum mit Baden - Württemberg und Bayern nicht gestaltet werden ?

     

    Auch hier gab zur Zeit des kalten Krieges wichtige Natostützpunkte und  die im Süden ansässigen Nato- Divisioen und Luftstreitkräfte waren vor allem für den Bereich de s Warschauer  Paktes entlang der bayrischen Grenze zuständig , desweiteren befindet sich in Bayern der größte US Truppenübungsplatz Grafenwöhr und Hohenfels ;  Lufwaffenverbände wie das AG 52 Immelmann  mit Phantom  waren in der Nähe von Freiburg inBremgarten nahe der französichen Grenze stationiert !  . Manching; Lansberg in Bayern oder Stuttgart in Baden Aürttemebrg waren wichtige  Natostützpunkte   In Heidelberg war das HQ der US Streitkräfte Europa stationiert und es gab einige Tuppenübungsplatze auf denen die NATO-Verbände übten, oder die Luftwaffen Einheiten Übungseinsätze flogen usw....   Das wurde dann im Zuge der Wiedervereinigung zum größten Teil aufgelöst , aber in den 80iger bzw im kalten Krieg   war das von Bedeutung 

     

    Warum also fehlt das auf der dann fertigen Deutschland -Map komplett ?  Oder wie soll man  die 3 Phasen Einteilungen der Karte verstehen 

    Compà, è un forum italiano. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 43 minutes ago, Volator said:

    Amen to that.
    First procedure after every patch is this for me:
    Try it, it doesn't break integrity check and makes the FM plausible again.

    Yes that's right, I and other guys in the group also always perform this modification. ED could set it to default, pending work on a resolving patch.

    @Flappie 

  4. for about 1.5 years, in an update of the Huey, the fuel consumption was changed and also the flight pattern was touched. The helicopter is now too reactive, even when fully loaded (armament and fuel) the aircraft takes off and flies too fast. Also in the hover, it requires too much left pedal. Reading online, watching various UH-1H videos on youtube and also talking to real pilots, all confirmed that the current flight model of the huey is wrong. It requires too much left pedal and is too powerful currently. 
    In the various virtual groups, we all edit the .lua file named FM, setting from “TRUE” to “FALSE” in order to return to the old flight model which was much better. 

    Please check and have the flight model analyzed by some real Huey helicopter pilot (so he can confirm the figure), also check the manuals where the flight data and performance are present. 
    This is a bug. I hope it will be reported and corrected or at least restored to the old flight model. 

    • Like 5
  5. Personalmente deluso dell'annuncio. Non riescono nemmeno a sviluppare un UH-1Y e pensano di fare un F35C...

    Leggendo il forum ED e Reddit, tutti (e anche io) chiedono di smettere di rilasciare nuovi moduli, di concentrarsi sul sistemare il "core" di DCS e fixare tutti i bug presenti. 

    Se la base presenta problemi e non è ottimizzata, ad ogni update si rompe qualcosa che resterà nel limbo per anni. Nuovi velivoli, nuovi bug che si sommano ai vecchi...

    Comunque, già era una mossa azzardata l'EFA, figuriamoci F-35.

    • Thanks 1
  6. Pensiero personale, con il rilascio del F-15C, la vedo brutta tra ED e Razbam... Avranno capito entrambi che resteranno nel limbo in questa situazione per anni.

    La cosa che non capisco, perchè inserire nella parte della mappa f10 in modalità RTS, i SU-33 e non i SU-27. Casualità o un messaggio nascosto? 

×
×
  • Create New...