Al-Azraq

Thanks YoYo. So if I get rid of OpenXR Tools, then it will not overwrite my SteamVR settings and I will be able to control everything from there which is what I want. I will try later!

Hey guys, I like to use SteamVR as the default OpenXR runtime as I want to keep using the per-app resolution settings. However, it seems that the selected resolution in SteamVR does not get applied and fpsVR reports 100% resolution. Is this a reporting problem from fpsVR or is SteamVR uncapable of changing the resolution through OpenXR? Also I have another question: if SteamVR is set as the default OpenXR runtime, is SteamVR in charge of reprojection? Thanks!

So sad to spend 2.000 € and watch the 4090 sit at 70-80% usage due to CPU bottleneck. And that is in a barebones mission.

What a monster of a GPU, but terrible pricing. Makes me consider storing my HP Reverb G2 and come back two years later when I upgrade my 3070 Ti to enjoy VR at 100% resolution. Maybe I just do that and back to TrackIR for now. Happy to know that we can brute force VR now, but that doesn't mean ED has still to do their part and optimise the game.

We have been saying that for a while now, even Nineline said to wait for multithreading before spending that money on a GPU but here we are. Sure the 4090 will offer a huge boost when not CPU bound (I think that in the air) but I wouldn't like spending 2.000 € just to have improvements just under certain circumstances.

Would it be possible to add the option to order Jester to change FOV while using LANTIRN? He stays in Wide FOV and I cannot identify anything.

I would like to know as well, I am missing it and I like to do full start-up procedures.

I don't think Heatblur is aiming to a particular Tranche or block but they will model all those capabilities, systems, and hardware they can get reliable information of. I find this approach the correct one because the representation of these features will be realistic, you will just not be able to say (this is a Tranche 2 Block 10). If they aim for an specific Tranche or Block, they will be limiting themselves. What if they decide to do a Tranche 2 Block 10 but can get information on the Brimstone or Meteor missile? Should they leave these stuff out because they are not for the specific version modelled? In my opinion, Heatblur is taking the right approach here.

I went back to the regular version and it is fine for me.

This is a great point. Every game needs gameplay loops and DCS gameplay loop is system managing. It is what keeps the player engaged throughout the session and it is what the player will try to improve on.

You are missing a big point here which is: we enjoy learning how to operate these planes, we enjoy flying them, we enjoy fighting with them. Yes, we know this is just a game at the end of the day but we enjoy the time we spend in it. I think that simulators are just not for you, and I don't think you should try to convince us that what we do is pointless, because it is not as long as we have fun.

You are right, it looks pretty dark in that video. I guess it depends on how much time has passed since it was last repainted. I would clear for an IFLOLS in DCS looking as clear as in that video!

Yeah, that as well. Also, am I the only one having many difficulties spotting the deck yellow and white lines? It is just a black deck for me until I'm very close. I have a Reverb G2.

I play on VR and the FLOLS is just very bright to the point I really can't see where the ball is exactly.

With the PC on my signup the map is just not playable on VR even if I drop my SteamVR resolution to 50%. Really disappointed because I was looking forward to playing The Big Show campaign here.