Jump to content

dsc106

Members
  • Posts

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS, IL-2, MSFS
  • Location
    USA
  • Interests
    Over complicated hobbies

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. There is a lot to like about this map, especially after the new update today and improved textures. Thank you for that!! But at the same time, I am getting nervous that the cities will not be fixed. They feel like placeholder cities at low level right now. At higher altitude they look nice - they are good from far, but far from good. As soon as you get low, there is no variety or distinction, and it is the same randomly rotated few assets for miles on end. Each of the major cities really needs a lot of TLC, because this map deserves to be used with helicopter ops. But right now, it's pretty lame for low level city flight. Does OnReTech intend to make the cities shine? Or will they be left to feel like procedural generations using the same few assets with a couple landmarks scattered about? I had assumed when I purchased the map they were in EA state, but I am beginning to fear they are considered "correct as-is". Please say it ain't so.
      • 8
      • Like
  2. In that case, what about just focusing on a Spitfire training campaign on the Normandy map, since arguably the dogfighting techniques with the spitfire would be the most interesting as a turn fighter? Many of the ideas and concepts would still translate for those of us who are starved for any sort of "original" or "classic" dogfighting training on prop aircraft. If not, the other alternative idea would be 2-3 totally separate mini campaigns (not sure if ED allows shorter/cheaper campaigns like that) for each aircraft type, where P-51 focuses on its energy management techniques and boom and zoom. Finally, just wanted to rearticulate my point "3" from original post: a single campaign with 18 missions that only requires any one module. But if you have 1 module, 6 missions show up. If you have 2 modules, 12, and 3 modules 18 missions show up. Basically, it's three mini campaigns sold bundled as one campaign. But all that aside, I think many of us would be content to see anything - and if I had to choose one, it would probably be the spitfire and RAF training just based on the fact that it would teach us traditional dogfighting the best!
  3. There are all sorts of training campaigns for Cold War and modern aircraft, and Reflected - you have two great ones for the F4E now - but nothing for WWII. This is a shame because I am not great at understanding WWII tactics and would prefer to learn BFM/ACM and dogfighting on prop aircrafts before moving on through history into cold war era and beyond. A WWII training campaign would be a great way to teach all sorts of basic combat airmanship (and increase interest and value in all your other campaigns) Because techniques continued to change through WWII and certain aircraft may not fit perfectly into the timeline, and because of some location limitations on maps (ie there was no training in Nevada at the time), and because the best way to do this may involve a variety of aircraft, I can see some potential challenges. But I think they are easy enough to solve. What about a 1944-ish historical fiction composite training campaign set in Normandy with either the P-51 or Spitfire, and/or P-47 as the aircraft. This could be done in several ways: Giving the user a choice of which to fly on a per mission basis. Upside is users could have either module, downside is specific instructions would be less customized to the specific airframe Requiring all of these modules for the campaign to work. Upside would be a great campaign touring you through techniques, downside would be limiting the campaign to users with several modules. But then again, the WW2 modules are pretty cheap these days and many people interested will own all of these as they are some of the most common A Campaign with several missions for each, IE 5-6 training missions per, but all in one campaign. The upside would be the more modules you own, the more value you get, but you could still access a good value even with one. Training items would include: Basic dogfighting skills: barrel rolls, scissors, yo-yos, and high/low yo-yos. Offensive and Defensive maneuvers Energy fighting, boom and zoom tactics Dive attacks Fighter-Bomber coordination ACM and techniques to coordinate with wingman Etc. I mean, you know the drill. Basically, I think it would be so great to get a good basic combat training - dogfighting, bombing and rocket ground attacks, escorts, etc. crafted for when it all began. Setting things later in WWII allows for the more advanced teaching of different tactics. I also know you prioritize pinpoint precision, but I feel there would be a lot of value in a campaign like this which takes some liberties to craft a sort of historical fiction composite and helps on-road new players to your other campaigns - people like me, who really don't know the proper tactics and resort to IL-2 videos or other descriptions online, or have to work in reverse and learn techniques used in more modern combat and apply them backwards. Hope you will consider something like what you've done for other cold war era training modules for the WWII timeframe!
  4. Does the F1 natively support English localization in the cockpit via Aerges (first party), or does it require a mod? Are things working now?
  5. Also wanted to follow up and say that the IA missions that ARE here, are all really well done! Playing through them, they are definitely above par vs most other modules that launch, so nice work Mag3.
  6. dsc106

    Sound issues

    While I've been happy with Echo19s work, I am not here to back any vendor. However it gets done, I just want to see it be at a quality level of Echo19 or Heatblur or ED first party. I get a little concerned when I hear just needs some "volumes and gains" because it needs a whole lot more than that. But there are no shortage of great sound engineers out there (though perhaps less specializing in accurate aircraft soundscapes for sims), so whatever the solution is, hopefully we can get something that sounds great, is true to the aircraft, and does this module (which I am really loving) true justice.
  7. It was announced last year that polychop had signed a 4 campaign contract with Baltic, but then the team broke up. Is there any confirmation whether Baltic Dragon is still working on any campaigns for the Kiowa?
      • 2
      • Like
  8. Thank you! Can’t wait!!
  9. Thanks for doing this on Kola map, it’s a great fit and the map is certainly better than many people make it out to be (and is indeed coming together very nicely). Love flying in a fresh environment and setting. If DCS is going to expand it needs people willing to create content for something other than the same old maps over and over again. Well done. Cheers!
  10. dsc106

    Sound issues

    If I pay the royalty rate and/or flat fee they request, do I also reap the benefits of a percent of the increased sales due to better community reviews? Look, I know those things are hard to track - what exactly accounts for what? But suggesting that someone is being unreasonable or entitled because the dev is the one to pay for it isn't reasonable, since the dev is also the one to profit from it. These modules are long term plays and after the initial wave of "buy it no matter what" crowd passes, the community feeling on a module is what sustains sales and word of mouth in the long run. Sounds are a massive part of the immersion factor in modules. Volume and gain adjustments won't be enough from what I've heard. Maybe it's not Echo19, but then, why not? It's his specialty. Hopefully you guys could reach a good deal. But whatever is done, it needs a truly professional touch that understands compressors and limiters, EQing, and so forth in a way that is going to bring this otherwise beautiful module to life.
  11. I was so confused to find no keybinds for the rocket box control (and gun charge/safe). These are essential. Especially in VR.
  12. GVad the pilot breakdown in the video is helpful, including stalls and inertia, but also the discussion in the comments there. There is discussion regarding the way the rudder is simulated, among other thinks. I hope Mag3 takes a look. A lot of the FM issues people are having do not seem like a major rewrites, but rather tweaks and refinements on an otherwise solid foundation. I am curious to know if some of the over G issues, or the issue posted on reddit where the aircraft spins out of control oddly, is tied to damage modeling (ie wings not ripping off) or how stalls are modeled. It does seem like if some of these issues are resolved (and if the sounds are enhanced) - neither of which seem out of reach in EA - the module will shape up very nicely.
  13. Hi team! I've followed for many years, and just want to commend you on a job well done. With all of the discussion, excitement, criticisms (aka "passion" ;)), etc. in the first few days, I feel it's important to say: THANK YOU. We see your hard work, and we know this module is a labor of love from a small and hard working team. And while we all have our points of constructive criticisms, the big picture is that this is overall off to such a great start! Very pleased to have this in game, and can't wait for the larger Pacific Theater to be built out more. Your Corsair has beautiful art and texture design, a nice set of included assets, and is a faithful reproduction of the F4U. It's been a blast to play with thus far. So, just a "thank you" and note of appreciation. We look forward to experiencing the module develop throughout EA and become refined to reach its full potential. Until then, just a shout out for all your hard work. Be encouraged - upwards and onwards! Cheers.
      • 10
      • Like
      • Thanks
  14. I know this isn't top priority - Flight Model, Sounds, Keybinds, Bugs, etc. take priority. And overall there is a decent spread of IA missions to jump right in. However, as the module progresses, I would really love to see a bit more from the Instant Action missions! Some simple quick start things that should really be there include: ESSENTIAL: Hot Start Taxi & Take-Off options (right now it's just cold start. You can't jump in to immediately practice take-offs without making a custom mission). Hot start options to practice both carrier and land based take-offs would be great. Landing Practice (Land/Field based) options (right now we have carrier landings, but no land based field options to quickly practice landings on). Target Practice scenarios (simple options to jump in with a fully loaded ship and just do ground based target practice on the various maps) IF POSSIBLE: A few more interesting scenarios on the key period maps (ie Marianas WW2) - there's just so little PTO content right now, it would be very nice to see a few more fun scenarios on the Marians map to quickly jump into and get our feet wet. EASY BONUS: Scenic Free Flight missions and basic options for other DLC maps (South Atlantic, Kola, Sinai, Cold War Germany, etc.) - it's always nice to just be able to quickly drop in if you own a map and cruise around. These don't need to be complex scenarios, just a few options for each map is a simple value add. While these are easy enough for us to create ourselves, it's also a nice value add that makes a module feel more complete.
  15. Thank you for the help. Good to know about the manual LUA edit option, but yes I think I will wait for official support added to avoid getting into the constant fixes throughout EA. What was dive break labelled as? I couldn't find it, whatever it was labelled.
×
×
  • Create New...