Jump to content

Gundamator

Members
  • Posts

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gundamator

  1. Now I want a Arleigh Burke with with 384 ESSM. It would also be cool see the concept of dual packed SM-2's (possible with some modification but never done) and the Patriot PAC 3 doubled packed into the Mark 41.
  2. I would love to see an M1A2c / M1A2 Sep v3 (there is now a Sep v4 but there aren't as many details on it as the v3) as a counter to this. With Trophy APS, ARAT ERA, M829A4, M1147, and the remote control .50 cal. Either way I love to see some new MBT's. - Gundamator
  3. I would love to see some modern MANPADs like the FIM-92J to go along with this. The FIM-92J compared to the early models we have ingame has ECCM a proximity fuse and is very maneuverable. A very deadly threat to enemy aircraft. There is also the Type 91, Starstreak, and Mistral among others. - Gundamator
  4. Personally I would love to see, the Stormer HVM with Marlet and Starstreak missiles aswell as the Sky Sabre (maybe also make IRIS-T SLM as they use a lot of similar assets.) - Gundamator
  5. Thank you, that looks excellent. I always love to see you modeling SAM systems especially western ones. Have you considered the Leichtes Flugabwehrsystem Ozelot, or the Crotale NG to add? It would also be interesting to see the new Dark Eagle hypersonic missile system, and MRC (ground launched tomahawk and SM-6 for ground attack) from the US Army. Either way I am exited to see what is added next, thank you for the work you do. - Gundamator
  6. Hello, I noticed that the AMRAAM-ER model on NASAMS 3 is abit off, it seems like you copied the ESSM model directly but the AMRAAM seeker head makes it look a bit different, I've put some reference photos bellow. I would appreciate it if you updated it.
  7. I would appreciate having this option. Will you also add the AIM-9X to this system? Perhaps the Block II version? Either way I am exited to see this system. v/r Gundamator
  8. Looking at the trajectory of the 9M723 I am assuming it is simply a limitation placed upon you by the game? It is not acting like a basaltic missile, its has a very flat trajectory when impacting the target. - Gundamator
  9. Having done some testing, the tweaks are much appreciated the PAC 3 especially seems to be performing for more accurately to real life. Thank you. - Gundamator
  10. Looking at the newest GR video I do think the PAC 3 could use some tweaking, the low altitude performance was expected but that first shot at the SCUD shouldn't have happened, if you look at the video below, you can see that the missile intercepts directly head-on hitting the front of the missile, it should not have attempted to loft above the missile like it did. The only time it does a loft like that is when it is intercepting low flying targets like shown in the second video. Presuming that you will add more more ballistic missiles to your collection, a working PAC 3 will prove necessary to give BLUEFOR any hope of survival, though I do hope you also intend to ad THAAD. - Gundamator
  11. Most interesting, I doubt that the Nakhimov will ever leave it's refit in service, but it would be very cool to see ingame.
  12. Any plan to add PrSM to your M142 HIMARS? It is planned to reach IOC this year. - Gundamator
  13. Hello CH, do you have any plans to model some NATO SAM systems? IRIS-T SLM, SAMP-T, MEADS, Multi Mission Launcher, E.T.C. I would to have them ingame at some point. - Gundamator
  14. Hello Currenthill, do you have any plans to make the Cortale NG short range SAM system from France? Its a really cool system and I would love to see it modeled. v/r Gundamator
  15. The Countermeasure system used on this aswell as the 055 seems unrealistic, is it a real system? I remember hearing on GR video that it is supposed to represent chaff, but it seems too good to me. - Gundamator
  16. That's a scary ship, but I have faith in AEGIS.
  17. I see, then I understand why its not added. While not directly applicable in this situation, I find it a shame you are stuck without the SDK having to base stuff off already ingame assets, even if I understand why.
  18. Hello, Do you have any plans to model the RIM-116 RAM? I find myself quite liking the HHQ-10 on the Type-055 and would like to see the U.S. Equivalent. v/r Gundamator
  19. Hello, I have been doing some testing of this mod against your 055, and have noted a deficiency in the SM-6. When engaging the YJ-18's they will fire at very long range against then loft high and then dive straight down onto them, however the YJ-18 is moving too fast leading the missile landing a bit behind the YJ and detonating to far away to kill it. I suspect similar performance will happen against other supersonic sea skimmers. I would appreciate it if you could patch the mod so the missiles either hit when fired like this, or so that the ships do not try to engage those missiles with that profile. The YJ-18 is also supposed to be subsonic cruise and supersonic terminal, however I suspect the reason this modeled wrong is game limitations. I have attached some photos below to help illustrate. v/r Gundamator
×
×
  • Create New...