Ansirial

Hi everybody, Just added some Pilot's badges for US Navy, US Marines and RAAF. Bye

Hi, I searched all this wonderful site, unfortunately as not australian I'm not so informed, so a question: Are enought the awards included in this section: "Australian Gallantry and Distinguished Service Awards"? Plus pilot's badge of course. Thanks

Yup! Sure, great idea.

Hi Maligno, Sorry for the delay, which type of badge? Consider the section is intended for awards, I can immagine pilot wings or marksman bagde...

Hi Speedofheat, that's why is the folder where log files are saved when you save debriefing in SP mission... That's a good idea to switch, you are right.

Hi Ultrablue, I missed this message sorry, the logfile contains a variable "result" If result is over 50 then the mission is recorded as success, if lower as failure; is 50 then is a draw. By the way this varible is often not correcly set by sim resulting in a 0, so failure. This happens nearly always for online sessions.

Hi Ultrablue, Just added RAAF, as the ranks are directly derived from RAF ones I already added arts. About awards do you think can I duplicate RAF awards? Do you think any dedicated award is needed? Also feel free if you need to convert any pilot to RAAF, I will provide in few database istructions.

Hi Tugais, did not noticed; maybe a temporary issue of my provider. I see it's working now... Hi Ultrablue, Sure but little complex... if you find any allegiance you need is missing please let me know; I will provide to add it

Hi Ultrablue, At the moment no, but it's a good point to develop. I will evaluate this for the next developements.

Sorry, my fault. Fixed.

Hi everybody! Added! Hi Tugais, Can I please have an example log file? At the moment I'm a little busy at work, but once free I will surely give a look Hi Nealius, Strange I remember I fixed that... can you share the log file please? Thanks

Hi Speed of Heat, Thanks! I give a check.

Hi Tugais, You are right, I have the same idea; only I need to change the calendar component to do so, I will search for that. Thanks,

Hi Tugais, I just released a new caledar format, now is possible to surf the calendar quite better. Still working on the other two requests in order to best integrate them also with the parsers. Bye

Hi tugais, Thanks a lot for the suggestions! I will keep them in mind, here few details/questions about: - I thought to add something to simplify navigation especially because with a long series of event it became difficult; - What do you mean for multicrew? Something related to multiple users for the F14 for instance? - This one is very intesting. Adding it for a manual control it is very easy but I need also to make it compatible with the log parser. The problem is to understand when the sunset/sunrise is also beacuse we ignore the period of the year the mission is created. This wuld be very useful also to identify carrier landing cases. Thanks again

Hi Frostycab, no problem here you are an example:

Thanks Nirvi, if any of you wish to add some new features interesting for everyone use, I would be happy to add and share them. For instance I recently added a greenie board on request. Things like statistics about refueling, landing and so on... please let me know.

Hi everybody, I just released an hotfix to fix a problem in the parsing of the log file. It happens that some events does not have an initiator, now this can't block the parsing anymore. Bye

Hi Norsegunar, Thanks a lot! I will check soon.

HI Survival, Yes, I thought to do this but I have no idea of what can be an interesting way to do that... A link, an iframe, what do you expect? Bye

Hi everybody! I just released a quick update of the sync app in order to fix multi session logs parsing system. I noticed they were not correctly parsed under some condition, now it should work a lot better. Enjoy, bye

Hi @Oban, Yes right! Done! Thanks

Hi everybody! New release of the sync app is out with single step target definition and the hidden prototype of the future awards system. Enjoy!

Hi Mistermann, Yes of course, first of all at the moment I'm applying this values: OK -> 5 OK -> 4 (OK) -> 3 B -> 2,5 --- -> 2 OWO -> 2 WO -> 1 C -> 0 NC -> 0 These are values I find correct after some researches, but if we need to be changed in order to better respect reality this can be done very easily. I'm really not sure about this evaluation table, I found some cases very different from each others. By the way, using this table your your 2 examples will be: 9 Bolters + 1 Cut ((9 x 2.5) + (0 x 1)) / 10 = 2.25 7 Waveoffs + 1 Cut + 2 Bolters ((7 x 1) + (0 x 1) + (2 x 2.5))/10 = 1.2 So using this evaluation method they are correct! Please let me know if you have any doubt. Bye

Hi Mistermann I think I got it! Just published an hotfix, please let me know if you still experience the issue. Thanks!