jojo Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/products/planes/flanker_fc/ Su 27: SPU-10 pitch only fly by wire system... Su 27 FBW isn't on the same level as Mirage 2000 3 axis fly by wire system in term of sophistication, where all 3 axis are coordinated. This is what gives the Mirage 2000 its "care free" handling capacity. Edited December 13, 2016 by jojo Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi
Kev2go Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) I am just begun to fly the Mirage, but there is something which disapoint me at first. The flight behavier. It feels like it fly like an arkade game, too easy to fly. If you come from the A-10 and especially from the MIG-21, it is all too easy to takeoff and land the Mirage. I don't know about the behavier in dogfight etc, but I love landings, especially in bad conditions, but with the Mirage, you can't almost do any thing wrong. Am I right? welcome to experiencing a fly By wire system on an aircraft. you dont control the aircraft technically. the computer system reads your flight stick movements, and maneuvers the plane for you. add to the that the m2000 is a smaller more nimble, airframe on its own, give it such a system and piloting such an aircraft doesnt feel as natural, more akin to a game. its FBW is also pretty sophiscated, as stated by others certainly better than the Su27s FBW system. many 4th gen fighters - present day have a form of FBW. Edited December 13, 2016 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
LJQCN101 Posted December 14, 2016 Posted December 14, 2016 Then M-2000 as 0 lateral acceleration law on yaw axis, something missing on F-16. The F-16 do have one, while it simply adds 19.32 * Ay to its yaw FLCS. EFM / FCS developer, Deka Ironwork Simulations.
Recommended Posts