[closed]Fighter vs. SA-10 - high attack

Look tacview!!!

You can try it yourself, but not interesting. I hope that the next patch bring many logical improvements. For now, it is pointless to fight. SAM, SARH, ARH...

There is a plan from developers to improve or we start to cry?

Eagle vs. SA-10.rar

With the F15c being an air superiority fighter I'm not sure it would ever get a SEAD tasking. While the real aircraft might have limited A2G guns capability I'm not even sure one would ever be asked to do so unless in an emergency. If I'm not mistaken this would be working as intended?

Ragnarok, please be more specific in a bug report. As far as I can tell you can be complaining about any of the following...

1. Missile flight models

2. Missile reaction to chaff

3. S-300 missiles exhibited strange behavior after being spoofed by chaff

4. S-300 should have shot more missiles at you

5. S-300 missiles didn't explode after chance of hitting you went to 0%

6. F-15C chaff is OP

7. F-15C in general is OP

Ragnarok, please be more specific in a bug report. As far as I can tell you can be complaining about any of the following...

 

1. Missile flight models

2. Missile reaction to chaff

3. S-300 missiles exhibited strange behavior after being spoofed by chaff

4. S-300 should have shot more missiles at you

5. S-300 missiles didn't explode after chance of hitting you went to 0%

6. F-15C chaff is OP

7. F-15C in general is OP

All of the items except number 4. But missile reaction to chaff on background sky is primary.

I was not more specific because I thought tacview speaks more than words.

What's going on with guidance? Do you simulate TVM guidance? Can radar station detect reflection and apply corrections via data-link (as irl)?

"I was not more specific because I thought tacview speaks more than words.

What do I need to tell the devs about the bug?

First, ONE BUG PER THREAD, when in doubt, create your own thread, if its a duplicate, we can merge them.

You need to supply the following:

What happened that resulted in the issue? Again, short, clear and concise. Dont write a novel.

What were you doing that caused, or seemed to cause the issue? Sometimes you wont know, sometimes it doesn't matter, but better to try and include it so ED Testers or Team can try to reproduce themselves.

Could you reproduce it? Bugs should be reproducible, you should be able to have it happen to you again before reporting it.

What module where you using, and does it happen with others? If you get a bug with the A-10C try it with another module, it could be the A-10C causing the issue, it could be the sim, and investigating you do now, makes it quicker for ED to diagnose.

Also include:

A Track: We would prefer a short one that shows the bug right away, if your track is very long, try to reproduce a short one showing the bug

A screenshot: In some cases a screenshot is enough, most times the devs prefer a track so they can watch and jump in or run on their debug version though

System specs: System.nfo file is perfect for this see here for steps to do so

DCS World logs: Logs can be found in the DCS folder in Saved Games in a folder called Logs. Please zip these and attach to your report post

 

What we don't need

We don't need unnecessary discussions, we don't mind people adding to a report if the experience the same thing and maybe have a different angle, but no chit chat

We don't need attitudes, maybe you think its a silly bug, or it should have been fixed before release or whatever, we require mature constructive reports without fluff. In some cases non native speakers might be reading these reports, make the as clear as possible without extras for them to try and understand

We don't need theories or opinions on other peoples reports. If you know its a duplicate you can flag the post and a moderator can merge it, but please don't chat chat or debate reports

Features are not bugs, we will have a wishlist for the new version, but we don't want reports asking for features, add-ons such as new airfields, new units, etc.

I think you could do better next time and be more helpful for ED

I think you could do better next time and be more helpful for ED

I could but I do not. I don't have time for more, because for a smart man this is enough.

If you don't want to provide a more specific bugreport, I can close this one.