Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thought this might be interesting information to DCS fans.

 

Questions of F35 purpose, cost and readyness aside, there is a boatload of interesting cockpit tech in there.

 

Among that is the

, 6 HD, fast infrared cameras mounted around and under the plane whose imagery gets panorama stitched in real time to create a full 360 degree IR view. This can be projected into the pilots helmet mounted display (immersively, ie. virtual reality rather than augmented reality) and cued with pilot head movements. The pilot can thus literally "look through the floor and behind the wings etc. of the plane. Useful for threat localization and seeing the ground while landing the VTOL versions of the plane.

 

Other things happening in the helmet are spatially registered target & friendly cues (like augmented reality) acquired from optical, infrared and radar sensors as well as incoming "SPI"s. Of course these systems all track multiple targets nowadays.

 

The pilot can also target weapons by "looking at the target" rather than just joystick designating. This includes cueing of high off-boresight sensors and weapons (eg look back over shoulder, below you etc.)

 

Of course the F35 still has a "real" cockpit in addition to all the HUD user interface in the helmet. Not clear to me whether the helmet functions in only fully opaque (virtual reality), semi-opaque (augmented reality / traditional helmet-HUD) and/or fully transparent modes.

 

In addition, there are several issues around display latency, resolution, head and eye tracking, motion sickness due to miscueing etc. that we are probably all somewhat familiar with from the intense development efforts and publications around the Oculus Rift and related tech (slides on Rift DK2 latency mitigation, Oculus Blog entry on VR sickness). Certainly the military has large budgets (even larger than Facebook ;) for this, but these are hard technical problems. Anybody have thoughts / insights as to how "solved" these issues are for a live & death platform like a military jet ?

 

Beyond the obligatory rara advertising videos by the vendors (which look a but simplistic, but perhaps we are spoiled from DCS videos !) there is a lot of fascinating technical information in the links below.

 

Overall Systems & Sensors

The F-35′s X-Ray Vision Is The Future Of Naval (And All Other) Warfare

F-35's Pilots Get Iron Man Targeting Upgrade

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter cockpit demonstrator hands-on

 

 

Helmet Mounted Display

F-35 Helmet Display System To Scare the Bejeezus Out of Enemies

F-35 VSI non-HUD HMD

 

 

Videos

F-35 glass cockpit - How to fly and drop bombs (F35 cockpit demonstrator video)

 

 

e4f90435.jpg

 

 

 

f-35-helmet-2.jpg

f35interface-helmet.jpg

More F35 Helmet Images

 

 

14-Side%20View%20of%20F-35%20Cockpit.jpg

F-35_Cockpit.jpg

More F35 cockpit images

 

 

 

QsSSgVq5bS18Ede-1hzuQEOprMxMUsaCMQ5Y4pHDzyDdpfdsHuxYVw1Zw5y3ncwvsZk7aLd3QKo=w1397-h1162

Edited by CodeToad

Working on an open source "kneeboard" app (browser based, so runs everywhere) for DCS world: maps, checklists, reference, glossary, calculators.

Posted

Wow the f-35 cockpit is so clean!

Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto

 

http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF

One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales...

:)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)

 

Posted
As for view, the helmet does great. That's just about all I can comment on concerning the helmet. DAS is also a great system, and it is super clear picture.

 

That's what I like to hear. :)

Posted
Wow the f-35 cockpit is so clean!

 

That bottom picture of the OP is of the AA-1, a pre-production jet that has things that both shouldn't be there or things that are missing. Pictures of the sim that Lockheed takes to shows are the best you're going to get of the production cockpit.

 

2129549.jpg

 

F-35-Full-Mission-Simulator-Lockheed-Martin.jpg

Posted

We need better programmers!!! (playing devils advocate here) but how bad ass would that be if we could just buy that. w/ DCS fun...

Intel i9-9900K 32GB DDR4, RTX 2080tiftw3, Windows 10, 1tb 970 M2, TM Warthog, 4k 144hz HDR g-sync.

Posted
We need better programmers!!! (playing devils advocate here) but how bad ass would that be if we could just buy that. w/ DCS fun...

 

You need declassification of information, not better programmers.

Rig: SimLab P1X Chassis | Tianhang Base PRO + Tianhang F-16 Grip w/ OTTO Buttons | Custom Throttletek F/A-18C Throttle w/ Hall Sensors + OTTO switches and buttons | Slaw Device RX Viper Pedals w/ Damper

Tactile: G-Belt | 2x BK LFE + 1x BK Concert | 2x TST-429 | 1x BST-300EX | 2x BST-1 | 6x 40W Exciters | 2x NX3000D | 2x EPQ304

PC/VR: Somnium VR1 Visionary | 4090 | 12700K

Posted
You need declassification of information, not better programmers.

 

I was referring to the simulation setup. Not the f-35. (Can fly f-35 in fsx,.. ). Also video image very nice!

Intel i9-9900K 32GB DDR4, RTX 2080tiftw3, Windows 10, 1tb 970 M2, TM Warthog, 4k 144hz HDR g-sync.

Posted
The AA-1 picture is actually closer. The sim is nice, but it is made to be pretty for all the big wigs plus it's missing a few things.

 

I only sat in the sim once, so I don't remember the specifics of what it had beyond what I can see in the picture. I know it swapped out the test equipment on the right most front panel with the knob that was supposed to be there, so I assumed it's more up to date than the AA-1. I do remember the sim was missing things though, but it's been too long for me to remember what.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...