SinusoidDelta Posted September 20, 2014 Posted September 20, 2014 I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to post this in. I did a quick search on the forum and didn't see it so I figured I'd share. I apologize if this is a repost. http://books.google.com/books?id=oUjlAwAAQBAJ&pg=PP6&dq=f-15c+manual&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zBAeVKr6EsWKyATxwIKADw&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAQ 1
GGTharos Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 That's no flight manual. Is also old, but it certainly shows some interesting things. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Krebs20 Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 It makes me want a DCS level F15 again. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Python Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 It makes me want a DCS level F15 again. You stopped wanting that? I'd love to be able to click all of those buttons. The FC3 F-15c is already superb, but a full on DCS update would be very much welcomed by me. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Krebs20 Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 A fighter like the f15c would be so far ahead of anything else in DCS that the only Opfor would be more F15Cs. It would be boring. At least to me. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
GGTharos Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 That's what all the ww2 players say about jets with missiles. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Python Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 A fighter like the f15c would be so far ahead of anything else in DCS that the only Opfor would be more F15Cs. It would be boring. At least to me. This might be a problem for a while, but no reason not to develop such aircraft. Eventually as more and more modules are developed, things will even out naturally. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
tarracta Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 A fighter like the f15c would be so far ahead of anything else in DCS that the only Opfor would be more F15Cs. It would be boring. At least to me. So the solution is to develop vintage fighters forever? No, it shows only the need of further DCS-level productions like F-16, Mig-29 oder Su-27. And then these WW2 clunkers would still be a nice practice target for beginners which still have to get used to missile operations :P
Overvolt Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 Man really nice, even ben not 100% use in game, have some interesting reads. Intel i7 7700K | ASUS MAXIMUN IX Hero | GSkill RBG 3000mhz 32G(4x8G) | MSI Trio 1080ti | 1x M.2 SSD Samsung 960PRO 512G | 1 x WesterDigital 4T | Corsair AX-850W | Monitor Alienware 34" aw3418dw | Oblisidian 800D |CORSAIR H80 | Teclado Logitech G15 |Mouse Razer DeathAdder Elite | Trackir 5 + Clip pro | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | Pedal MFG Crosswind
Krebs20 Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 My current fix is on the Mig21/Ka50/SU25A. I would love more airframes on that's level of tech. That's my personally opinion. I am hostage like everyone else here to what airframes I can fly in DCS. I have no say on what gets made or what doesn't. I would never ask for a company not to build an airframe. When the F18 is out my feelings on this will change as it's going to need an escort. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
SinusoidDelta Posted September 23, 2014 Author Posted September 23, 2014 (edited) That's no flight manual. Is also old, but it certainly shows some interesting things. It certainly does. It amazes me the wealth of information that can be found on the internet that would've been nearly unattainable a few years ago. Here is another interesting read, a "General Dynamics Flight Manual" for the F-16 MLU. It has some pretty incredible details. GENERAL DYNAMICS F – 16 FALCON: FLIGHT MANUAL 4 Edited September 23, 2014 by SinusoidDelta
Recommended Posts