upyr1 Posted April 23, 2006 Posted April 23, 2006 I disagree ... how about A-4? :D The Alpha jet may bet be better. :smartass:
MBot Posted April 24, 2006 Posted April 24, 2006 The F-111F pretty much owns everything already in the sim in A2G ability. ... Actually, the Vark accounted for over 70% of anti-armor kills in ODS, with no losses in that conflict. That was in the early 90's, when it was finally coming into its own. They could have added Pavetack and an array of GBU-12 to a Boeing 767 and scored even more armour kills in ODS. It is no art to circle in safe airspace forever and picking single targets with GBUs :) Now you tell me to do anti-armour or CAS in a 80s Europe scenario with a real fighter threat and real SAM threat I take the A-10 over the F-111 anytime. Sure, the Vark is a great deep striker but it's success in the anti-armour role is more a curiosity of history. Ok, now that was OT :D
Stealth_HR Posted April 24, 2006 Posted April 24, 2006 See I want the F-4 GG wants the A-4 and you want the F-111 Me thinks we could compromise and have all three in a 70's era sim that features the F-111F for LOMAC...:joystick: with the Russians geting the MiG-23/27 21 and SU-24 Man can always dream... I'd be up for any of those, especilly the Phantom and the Fishbed. :smilewink: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Real men fly ground attack :pilotfly: where EVERYTHING wants a piece of you :D
Recommended Posts