warthogmadman987 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 I honestly dont think that a person can compare MSFS and Lockon. One is a shooting flying game and another is for really joyriding or heavy flight. The two are completly different. If you mod FS 2004 with the right junk, i can be really fun. It is sterile, yes, but it looks like they are fixing that. I also like how i can mod my hometown and put in my house, hell, i even make it a mansion if i want to. Maybe a walk out basement. I really cant wait for MSFS X, i think it will be completly different, and i cant wait for some of the mods. One thing that people have to realize is that the MSFS games only really look good from higher up 5,000 plus. But they are making it better lower, and i think that some mods for it will atleast make it look good. Now some can say lockon looks better lower, sometimes i have to disagree, are you telling me that you fly at 500 feet and all i see is green? Lets face it, each game has strong and weak points, but each game was made for what the developer wanted, that me not be what you would like. Not everybody gets life their way. This isnt burger king. We get it their way, and like most nice developers and distributors (except EA) they give it your way. I luv both of them and i will definitly buy both black shark and msfs X. Infact, those will be my only flying sims i plan to buy. Only waiting for SCDA, Crysis, GTR2, and maybe spore.
ALDEGA Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 I honestly dont think that a person can compare MSFS and Lockon. One is a shooting flying game and another is for really joyriding or heavy flight. The two are completly different. If you mod FS 2004 with the right junk, i can be really fun. It is sterile, yes, but it looks like they are fixing that. I also like how i can mod my hometown and put in my house, hell, i even make it a mansion if i want to. Maybe a walk out basement. I really cant wait for MSFS X, i think it will be completly different, and i cant wait for some of the mods. One thing that people have to realize is that the MSFS games only really look good from higher up 5,000 plus. But they are making it better lower, and i think that some mods for it will atleast make it look good. Now some can say lockon looks better lower, sometimes i have to disagree, are you telling me that you fly at 500 feet and all i see is green?Graphics are not the issue.
warthogmadman987 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Graphics are not the issue. maybe not for you, for some it seemed it did, and if it is flight modeling, yes, it sux in MSFS.
wsoul2k Posted July 10, 2006 Author Posted July 10, 2006 The low level fly is bether....just look at the pics...the tow is very good My post was not to try compare Lockon and MSFS X ....it was just to show how well done the graphics are rigth now The clouds from MSFS are the best i have seen... and i really wanna see what we can get from DX10.... Rodrigo Monteiro LOCKON 1.12 AMD 3.8 X2 64 2G DDR ATI X1800XT 512 SAITEK X-36 AND VERY SOON TRACKIR-4
zaGURUinzaSKY Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Too bad the perfomance will suck donkey balls and too bad it will be a sterile world, as all MS SIM have always been. The graphics are just marketing for sales. ??what??? Robbie.
Recommended Posts