bkthunder Posted February 15, 2018 Posted February 15, 2018 when hovering, the roll axis is very sensitive, but the pitch axis is quite the opposite, it takes a big deflection of the stick to obtain a reaction. If this is realistic, then be it, but it seems a bit suspect. Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s
Repsol2k Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 Maybe this gives u a answer for your question : 11.8.10 Hovering The aircraft is unstable in yaw and has neutral stability in pitch and roll in hovering flight. The reaction controls are acceleration demand controls as opposed to the normal rate demand control of aerodynamic surfaces. This difference requires no conscious change of pilot technique but can lead to over control until experience is gained. Turns with very small angles of bank can be made at speeds up to 30 knots. Large sideslip angles can inadvertently develop due to directional instability at low speed which results in yaw out of the relative wind. The sideslip which can be developed causes large rolling moments which, in extreme cases, can lead to loss of control. If significant sideslip develops, use rudder to reduce the sideslip and aileron to level the wings. If roll is used to reduce sideslip, a sudden increase in incidence will occur with a resultant increase in rolling moment and possible loss of control. Source: https://info.publicintelligence.net/AV-8B-000.pdf 1
bkthunder Posted February 18, 2018 Author Posted February 18, 2018 Maybe this gives u a answer for your question : 11.8.10 Hovering The aircraft is unstable in yaw and has neutral stability in pitch and roll in hovering flight. The reaction controls are acceleration demand controls as opposed to the normal rate demand control of aerodynamic surfaces. This difference requires no conscious change of pilot technique but can lead to over control until experience is gained. Turns with very small angles of bank can be made at speeds up to 30 knots. Large sideslip angles can inadvertently develop due to directional instability at low speed which results in yaw out of the relative wind. The sideslip which can be developed causes large rolling moments which, in extreme cases, can lead to loss of control. If significant sideslip develops, use rudder to reduce the sideslip and aileron to level the wings. If roll is used to reduce sideslip, a sudden increase in incidence will occur with a resultant increase in rolling moment and possible loss of control. Source: https://info.publicintelligence.net/AV-8B-000.pdf Thanks, but nope, it doesn't. All I am saying is the roll is much faster and sensitive than the pitch, never talked about yaw. WHat you quoted doesn't say anything about a difference in sensitivity and roll rate, compared to pitch rate. Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s
Repsol2k Posted February 18, 2018 Posted February 18, 2018 How it would be to open the link and to read further ? I mean i can qoute all the content of the document but then u still need to search for what ure looking for though ? Maybe this helps u more because i only qoute what the Manual says and i dont give u the answer u may looking for. 11.8.18.1.1 Pitch The airplane is neutral to unstable in pitch in the V/STOL regime. As the airspeed decreases below approximately 120 KCAS, during a decel with the nozzles down, the pilot must begin to program the stick forward and trim nose down to counter the increasing nose--up pitch tendency. There is a “neutral point” around 100 to 110 KCAS where the airplane will tend to maintain its attitude. Forward extending stores, water, and engine thrust (adding power) can further increase the instability. In ground effect on roll--on landings and during the decel, approaching the hover, and while executing the vertical landing, the AV--8B II+ and TAV--8B’s nose often tends to drop unless this is anticipated by the pilot. 11.8.18.1.2 Yaw and Roll The jet is increasingly stable in yaw and roll at speeds above 60 to 70 KCAS as the airflow over the vertical stabilizer contributes a strong counter--force to yaw and aerodynamic flight controls regain effectiveness. The jet, however, is near neutral stability in yaw and roll between 50 to 60 KCAS and unstable below 50 KCAS. In addition to honoring the one--half lateral stick limitation, the pilot must control yaw at all times using the wind vane, rudder pedal shakers, and VSTOL ball (HUD sideslip indicator) because appreciable yaw between 30 to 90 KCAS can lead toloss of control due to sideslip--induced roll.
bkthunder Posted February 18, 2018 Author Posted February 18, 2018 How it would be to open the link and to read further ? I mean i can qoute all the content of the document but then u still need to search for what ure looking for though ? Maybe this helps u more because i only qoute what the Manual says and i dont give u the answer u may looking for. I have the manual. Again, it speaks about stability, not roll rate vs. pitch rate The closest I found to my question is in 11.8.18.2. RCS and 11.9.1.1 BLEED USAGE. To sum it up: the RCS controls use bleed air. Using more than one axis at a time (e.g. pitch and roll), will use up more bleed air, making all axles less responsive. Only when the aircaft is at low gross weight (and especially Radar Harriers and double-seaters), the CG is so far forward that the nose RCS nozzle has to stay open constantly to keep the nose up, thus reducing bleed air avilability for the other axles. However this is mainly evident on Radar versions and in hot weather. Again, no word (so far) about differences in pitch rate compared to roll rate. Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s
Recommended Posts