hansangb Posted September 4, 2018 Posted September 4, 2018 Don't do the RAID. The cons FAR FAR outweigh the benefit. The read/write speed of RAID0 made sense when using magnetic disks even though your increasing your chances of losing data. But for SSD, you're not hurting for RW speed. NVMe prices are coming down, so any reputable vendor will be OK. hsb HW Spec in Spoiler --- i7-10700K Direct-To-Die/OC'ed to 5.1GHz, MSI Z490 MB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, EVGA 2080 Ti FTW3, NVMe+SSD, Win 10 x64 Pro, MFG, Warthog, TM MFDs, Komodo Huey set, Rverbe G1
BitMaster Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 Don't do the RAID. The cons FAR FAR outweigh the benefit. The read/write speed of RAID0 made sense when using magnetic disks even though your increasing your chances of losing data. But for SSD, you're not hurting for RW speed. NVMe prices are coming down, so any reputable vendor will be OK. Do not do the Intel Sata-SSD Raid setup if you have a choice. This is no setup you should strive for for many reasons as hansangb has already pointed out. All those reasons root in a bad catchback if the sh!t hits the fan. Since you are new to Raid itself, please follow this advice and do 1 large NVMe or 1 large SSD over 2 raided SSD's of any kind on a cheap Intel chip. The thing is, Raid-0 misses the "R" of the it's definition, REDUNDANCY. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
ElCuco68 Posted September 5, 2018 Author Posted September 5, 2018 Do not do the Intel Sata-SSD Raid setup if you have a choice. This is no setup you should strive for for many reasons as hansangb has already pointed out. All those reasons root in a bad catchback if the sh!t hits the fan. Since you are new to Raid itself, please follow this advice and do 1 large NVMe or 1 large SSD over 2 raided SSD's of any kind on a cheap Intel chip. The thing is, Raid-0 misses the "R" of the it's definition, REDUNDANCY. What do you think of this, or should I spend more on the WD Black NVMe (or just get an SATA SSD)? https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07C8NNQ4Q/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1 Asus ROG Maximus X Hero MB Intel i7-8700K 5.2 GHz delidded & lapped Corsair H100i CPU watercooler EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2 80+ Platinum PSU EVGA FTW3 watercooled GTX-1080Ti 32GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM Two Toshiba XG5 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD's Various SSDs and HDDs, 24 terabytes 6 Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM fans in push/pull on CPU and GPU radiators. Windows 10 Pro 64, Oculus Rift CV1, TM Warthog throttle and flight stick.
Sn8ke_iis Posted September 6, 2018 Posted September 6, 2018 I found the 1 TB NVMe in my signature on EBay as "refurbished", it was pulled from a returned laptop if I remember correctly. Don't remember what I payed exactly, but it was well below retail. And there is definitely practical benefit to a fast NVMe SSD. Windows boots faster, and DCS loads faster. The effect on FPS is probably negligible versus a standard SSD. Concur with one SSD for OS and one for Games. It can save you from losing data or downloading things over again if Windows gets flaky on you.
etherbattx Posted September 6, 2018 Posted September 6, 2018 (edited) Very strange GPU and CPU usage. And there is definitely practical benefit to a fast NVMe SSD. ... DCS loads faster. how much faster is it to load dcs? does it save 10 seconds? 2 seconds? we switched to a nvme ssd drive at work. no dcs installed on that machine, but the windows boot times were only 1-2 seconds faster. Edited September 6, 2018 by etherbattx
Automan Posted September 6, 2018 Posted September 6, 2018 Considering random read speed of NVME m.2 are about the double of an SSD of the same size, I would say 100% faster loading (half time). ACER Predator Orion 9000: W10H | Intel i9-7900X OC@4.5Ghz | 8x16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport | Sapphire GTX1080TI | Intel 900P 480GB | Intel 600P 256GB | HP EX950 1TB | Seagate Firecuda 2TB ACER Predator XB281HK: 28" TN G-SYNC 4K@60hz ThrustMaster Warthog Hotas, TPR, MFD Cougar Pack, HP Reverb Pro
BitMaster Posted September 6, 2018 Posted September 6, 2018 It's not the 3xxxMB/sec that counts, it's the lower latency to get to that 1 stupid file you need NOW or your game will halt and have it appear as a stutter. **not saying SSD produces stutter in DCS, not that I am aware of. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
Recommended Posts