Rverb with a 1080Ti/8700K

[Wolf8312]

Just wondering how you guys reckon or have found the Reverb to work with DCS performance wise? I know its a tricky question because VR is not only variable, system to system but also person, to person with some people finding reprojection to be barely noticible and others not being able to tolerate it.

So maybe in comparison to CV1 or the Vive, do you think there would be a significant or noticeable drop in performance?

 

Kind of thing that I would probably not be able to go back from even if performance was poor, but I want most of all to be able to play the DCS campaigns in VR without poor performance. I actually think DCS looks incredible already, so I can well imagine how good it looks with a bump in resolution, but I am someone who never puts pixel density up too high (1.2) always -though I do have a standard such as using MSSA 4x) myself and find that performance suffers noticeably when doing so. Bad performance for me, grates over time far more than low res ever has, to the point were I stop playing.

 

Although better res is a game changer, VR wise I've honestly found fluid performance to be the most immersive aspect of all. Bad performance reminds one more than anything that he is playing a computer game!

Performance is so smooth now for me that I wouldn't want to jeopardize that, and also don't want to waste money obviously.

 

I'm not going to upgrade my GPU until the next generation TI comes along as the 20 series doesent seem significant enough of an upgrade for the price, and besides I'm not even sure how well DCS will be able to utilize the extra horsepower.

[Hellcat]

I'm Running a slightly OC 1080ti and with reprojection on I'm steady 45 everywhere....Uncommenting and activating the "MotionReprojectionMode:auto" in the default.vrsettings file will give you quite a bit of smoothing and excellent play. whether your wasting your money or not is subjective...

Edited June 20, 2019 by Hellcat

[Nagilem]

+ 1 on Hellcats comment. Also, more pixels means less SS or PD since it should equal less jaggies. You *may* be able to reduce the MSAA to x2.

[hansangb]

Just wondering how you guys reckon or have found the Reverb to work with DCS performance wise? I know its a tricky question because VR is not only variable, system to system but also person, to person with some people finding reprojection to be barely noticible and others not being able to tolerate it.

So maybe in comparison to CV1 or the Vive, do you think there would be a significant or noticeable drop in performance?

 

Kind of thing that I would probably not be able to go back from even if performance was poor, but I want most of all to be able to play the DCS campaigns in VR without poor performance. I actually think DCS looks incredible already, so I can well imagine how good it looks with a bump in resolution, but I am someone who never puts pixel density up too high (1.2) always -though I do have a standard such as using MSSA 4x) myself and find that performance suffers noticeably when doing so. Bad performance for me, grates over time far more than low res ever has, to the point were I stop playing.

 

Although better res is a game changer, VR wise I've honestly found fluid performance to be the most immersive aspect of all. Bad performance reminds one more than anything that he is playing a computer game!

Performance is so smooth now for me that I wouldn't want to jeopardize that, and also don't want to waste money obviously.

 

I'm not going to upgrade my GPU until the next generation TI comes along as the 20 series doesent seem significant enough of an upgrade for the price, and besides I'm not even sure how well DCS will be able to utilize the extra horsepower.

 

 

Ours is pretty similar w/ the exception of the GPU. And I'm getting steady 80-90 FPS with 180% SS on SteamVR and 1.0 PD in DCS. I posted my in game setting in the HP REVERB thread yesterday.