Lau Posted April 18, 2020 Posted April 18, 2020 Hey everyone, Noticed that the C101 does not require rudder inputs to keep the slip indicator centred. No matter the bank angle, the slip indicator remains pretty much centred without pilot rudder corrections. Realistic or a Bug? Thanks in advance for your feedback, Best, Lau F4E, F14B, F18C, F16C, M2KC, A10C, C101, AH64D, BSHARK3, SA342M, MI8, P51D, SPIT, MOSSIE PG, NTTR, SYR, NORM2, WW2PK, CMBARMS, SCVN Asus F17 RG I9 RTX3060 64RAM NVME 2To, TMWarthog, Saitekpedals, TrackIR,
Vibora Posted April 18, 2020 Posted April 18, 2020 There is adverse yaw when applying aileron, you can see it in the displacement of the slip indicator ball. Since the C-101 has neutral lateral stability, once established in the desired bank angle, there is no need to apply aileron and therefore adverse yaw effect disappears. Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
kontiuka Posted April 18, 2020 Posted April 18, 2020 I noticed there is still a tiny bit of adverse yaw even when ailerons are neutralized. Is this because the outside wing is moving faster in the turn, creating more lift, and hence more drag? I tried one of my other modules, the F-86, and it actually behaves quite similarly. Apples and bananas, I know.
Vibora Posted April 19, 2020 Posted April 19, 2020 If that effect would exist would be negligible. What in fact exists is an adverse yaw dampening due to the yaw rotation, as the drag increases in the forward moving wing (this happens while there is some rotation around the longitudinal axis during banking). There are many, more or less, decent explanations in internet for adverse yaw. Or you can download some book about aerodynamics. I can recommend you some if you PM me. Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts