OG84 Posted May 7, 2020 Posted May 7, 2020 (edited) Hi pilots, i would like to collect some data on which system components have the most impact on VR performance. That's why i would ask you to take part in the following voluntary survey (no personal data is collected, only system specs). E.g. what i would like to know if the latest high core count amd cpus perform better in a Steam VR environment than some older but fast single core cpus. I will share and present the results later, but you can already watch the current data yourself after you complete the survey. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdp6019Z5WOcl4hUt9CUhVJqPSqHn0X-T4hhcSauc2oOkAxPQ/viewform thx :smartass: PS: you can also submit multiple times if you like, e.g. with different super sampling settings or core clocks Current Results (2.5.6.47404) super sampling 1.0-1.2 9.1ms (109fps*) -> Ryzen 9 3900x (12+12 core 4.1ghz oc) + 2080ti + 32 GB DDR4@1599 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.0 = 0.061 FPS per € 9.5ms (105fps*) -> i7-7700k (4+4 core 5ghz oc) + 2080ti + 32 GB DDR4@1596 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.0 = 0.062 FPS per € 10.1ms (99fps*) -> i7-9700k (8 core 4.8ghz oc) + 1080 + 32GB DDR4@1596 + Samsung Odyssey + super sampling 1.0 = 0.087 FPS per € 10.5ms (95fps*) -> i7-7700k (4+4 core 4.2ghz stock) + 2080ti + 32GB DDR4@1596 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.0 = 0.056 FPS per € 25ms (40fps*) -> i7-7700k (4+4 core 4.2ghz stock) + 1080 + 16GB DDR4@1500 + Rift S + super sampling 1.2 = 0.048 FPS per € 44ms (22fps*) -> i5-3570k (4 core 4.4ghz oc) + 1080 + DDR3 @1596 + Rift CV1 + super sampling 1.0 = 0.029 FPS per € super sampling 1.4-1.5 11ms (90fps*) -> Ryzen 9 3900x (12+12 core 4.1ghz oc) + 2080ti + 32 GB DDR4@1599 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.5 = 0.061 FPS per € 12ms (83fps*) -> i7-7700k (4+4 core 5ghz oc) + 2080ti + 32GB DDR4@1596 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.4 = 0.062 FPS per € 12.3ms (81fps*) -> i7-9700k (8 core 4.8ghz oc) + 1080 + 32GB DDR4@1596 + Samsung Odyssey + super sampling 1.5 = 0.087 FPS per € 12.6ms (79fps*) -> i9-9900k (8+8 core 4.9ghz oc?) + 2080ti + 64GB DDR4@1066 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.5 = 0.060 FPS per € 14ms (71fps*) -> Ryzen 5 3600 (6+6 core 4.2ghz oc) + 2070 + 32GB DDR4@1596 + Valve Index + super sampling 1.4 = 0.127 FPS per € * projected fps, just 1000 divided by frametime. Not necessarily the fps shown in dcs due to reprojection or other frame locking. * price per € = fps (ss1.0) divided by sum of current cpu, gpu and ram price Systems with most bang for buck: 1. Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 2070 2. i7-9700k + GTX 1080 The frametimes shown, are only for the the TF-51D quickstart mission (cold start from krymsk). Also note the different super sampling settings. E.g. when I project the 9900k to super sampling 1.0, then it runs a 8,4ms frametime. The results do not represent the general dcs performance throughout all missions. There a probably other missions where gpu or ram size has a higher impact. Personal note: Although I have ~10ms frametime in this single player mission, I only have ~40ms frametime in multiplayer. Edited May 10, 2020 by OG84 Favorite module: F16C Currently learning F15E 13900k - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - Varjo Aero - TM Warthog Hotas - Pedals
OG84 Posted May 9, 2020 Author Posted May 9, 2020 updated... Favorite module: F16C Currently learning F15E 13900k - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - Varjo Aero - TM Warthog Hotas - Pedals
Motomouse Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 Your conclusion is lacking. ;-) VIC-20@1.108 MHz, onboard GPU, 5KB RAM, μυωπία goggles, Competition Pro HOTAS
OG84 Posted May 9, 2020 Author Posted May 9, 2020 Well my personal conclusion is, that a high end ryzen performs on the same level as a high end intel. That suprised me the most. Even with way less core clock. But 10900k is around the corner. though i cannot verify all results, except my own. Due to lack of more data I cannot give more conclusions at the moment ;) Favorite module: F16C Currently learning F15E 13900k - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - Varjo Aero - TM Warthog Hotas - Pedals
The_Nephilim Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 @OG 84, I think the 9700K is an i7 not an i9.. Not sure If I put that there as that was my test result.. so maybe make a correction there so there are not users looking for an i9 9700K ;) Intel Ultra 265K 5.5GHZ / Gigabyte Z890 Aorus Elite / MSI 4070Ti Ventus 12GB / SoundBlaster Z SoundCard / Corsair Vengance 64GB Ram / HP Reverb G2 / Samsung 980 Pro 2TB Games / Crucial 512GB M.2 Win 11 Pro 21H2 / ButtKicker Gamer / CoolerMaster TD500 Mesh V2 PC Case
The_Nephilim Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 Your conclusion is lacking. ;-) maybe you can enlighten us a bit what is lacking?? Intel Ultra 265K 5.5GHZ / Gigabyte Z890 Aorus Elite / MSI 4070Ti Ventus 12GB / SoundBlaster Z SoundCard / Corsair Vengance 64GB Ram / HP Reverb G2 / Samsung 980 Pro 2TB Games / Crucial 512GB M.2 Win 11 Pro 21H2 / ButtKicker Gamer / CoolerMaster TD500 Mesh V2 PC Case
OG84 Posted May 9, 2020 Author Posted May 9, 2020 @OG 84, I think the 9700K is an i7 not an i9.. Not sure If I put that there as that was my test result.. so maybe make a correction there so there are not users looking for an i9 9700K ;) thx, that was a typo. fixed. Favorite module: F16C Currently learning F15E 13900k - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - Varjo Aero - TM Warthog Hotas - Pedals
OG84 Posted May 10, 2020 Author Posted May 10, 2020 Would the i9-9900k mind to retest with super sampling 1.0? Favorite module: F16C Currently learning F15E 13900k - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - Varjo Aero - TM Warthog Hotas - Pedals
Motomouse Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 Lacking because in the conclusion only the combination CPU & GPU is mentioned. But other factors like HMD are very important too because of the different render resolution. :-) Thanks anyway for the valuable collection of the data. VIC-20@1.108 MHz, onboard GPU, 5KB RAM, μυωπία goggles, Competition Pro HOTAS
Recommended Posts