Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't ever seem to recall being able to see a fighter sized target on the Hornets radar from 90 miles out. Is this a bug or an update to the F-18 radar? The target I could see was a Su-27 at 30000ft hot on me at mach 1. My altitude and speed were the same.

Posted

The Su-27 is a BIG bird, and something that big coming at you at Mach 1 will deliver a pretty decent radar return

i7 - 9700K | 32 GB DDR4 3200 | RTX 2080 | VKB Gunfighter Mk II /w MCG Pro | Virpil T-50CM2 Throttle | TrackIR 5 | VKB Mk. IV

 

AJS-37 | A/V-8B | A-10C | F-14A/B | F-16C | F-18C | F-86F | FC3 | JF-17 | Ka-50 | L-39 | Mi-8 | MiG-15bis | MiG-19 | MiG-21bis | M2000-C | P-51D | Spitfire LF Mk. IX | UH-1H

Posted
Also, just to check, are you sure it was your radar that detected it or a Datalink contact from another source?

 

No AWACS present. Personally I like the long detection ranges, just wondering if it is representative of the real hornets radar that’s all.

Posted
RWS, Hi/Med PRF, 6 bar elevation and 140 degree azimuth scan. Bugged an F-16 at 85nm today too. As I said I actually really like this and hope it stays this way.

 

Seems legit to me. I've had the same experience as well. But I couldn't comment on whether or not that's realistic.

Posted (edited)

RWS certainly has the output power to see further than TWS for example, so could certainly illuminate a large airframe like the SU enough to pick it out at the ranges you state. The F-16 at 85 ish NM though, personally I would think the 16 should be able to get a little closer before being picked up, but in both cases target aspect should have a significant bearing.

Given the altitude, (and since I don’t think DCS simulates earth curvature) it seems quite plausible that it will be picked out.

Edited by garyscott

- - - The only real mystery in life is just why kamikaze pilots wore helmets? - - -

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...