topol-m Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Alright I`m taking Groove`s turn then :D I know you won`t mind, people :P [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
gigz-on Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 I think we should rename this thread - Neverending contest (questions by topol-m ) :lol: My YouTube Channel:
topol-m Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 LOL :cheer3nc: Great idea! ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Topol-m, what the heck?! Let the others have some fun as well, man! :P
topol-m Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Alright answer that one and I`m leaving you guys alone for 2-3 weeks. :bye_3: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
topol-m Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 The first clue - this is an experimental aircraft. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 The first clue - this is an experimental aircraft. Why this doesn't surprise me? :music_whistling: Is it British?
topol-m Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 Why this doesn't surprise me? :music_whistling: Is it British? It is like a rule that I rarely break not to tell the country of origin. I might tell where it isn`t from but telling the country of origin is the second most powerful clue after the company manufacturer :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Fjordmonkey Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 I'm thinking british, and twin-engined. No idea apart from that. Regards Fjordmonkey Clustermunitions is just another way of saying that you don't like someone. I used to like people, then people ruined that for me.
Neon Knight Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 topol-m this is: 1 - US 2 - jet-powered 3 - twin-engine aircraft 4 - looking at quality of photo, it is 50's or 60's Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft? ...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall) Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)
topol-m Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 (edited) topol-m Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft? It`s an experimental aircraft that never entered serial production. Edited February 8, 2010 by topol-m [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
IvanK Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 (edited) The cockpit is far to orderly to be a British product .... and I think you have been sneaky by posting it as a mirror reversal :) Edited February 8, 2010 by IvanK
topol-m Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 .... and I think you have been sneaky by posting it as a mirror reversal :) Maybe or maybe not :P Tests of the aircraft were conducted in the 50s. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Namenlos Ein Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 topol-m this is: 1 - US 2 - jet-powered 3 - twin-engine aircraft 4 - looking at quality of photo, it is 50's or 60's Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft? 1 — No. 2 — Yes. 3 — No. 4 — 1947-1952. Can I give the answer?
Namenlos Ein Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Answer is the Switzerland's first jet fighter aircraft FFA N-20 Aiguillon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFA_N-20 Looks like topol-m likes this aircraft. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=780320&postcount=1641 What is this?
topol-m Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Looks like topol-m likes this aircraft. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=780320&postcount=1641 Yeah, first the external view and now the cockpit, you guessed them both :thumbup: As I promised I`m taking a 3 weeks break from this thread. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Neon Knight Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 What is this? Su-24 with some bombs under its wings and belly.:) As for bombs, i can make an educated guess, and say that it's ZB-500s (ЗБ-500)... ...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall) Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)
Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 As I promised I`m taking a 3 weeks break from this thread. C'mon, Topol-m, don't go! You know we love you :D
topol-m Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 (edited) C'mon, Topol-m, don't go! You know we love you :D Don`t worry I`ll be back in 3 weeks in full power, with 8-10 hard riddles prepared :thumbup: Edited February 8, 2010 by topol-m [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Neon Knight Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 No, it is not ZB-500. Well, then my guess was not that educated :doh:. Thing looks pretty much like SAB-250-200. Maybe it is indeed SAB-250-200 or SAB-250T? ...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall) Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)
Namenlos Ein Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 Well, then my guess was not that educated :doh:. Thing looks pretty much like SAB-250-200. Maybe it is indeed SAB-250-200 or SAB-250T? It looks very similar to SAB-250-200, but it's smaller and used for different purpose. SAB-250-200 Length without fuse — 1492–1500 mm. Diameter — 325 mm. Weight — 201 kg. Weight of illuminating charge — 68,8 kg. Number of flares — 7. Burning time of each flare — at least 6 min. ??? Diameter — 280 mm. Length — 1065 mm. Weight — 98 kg. Time of burning — >195 sec.
zakobi Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 SAB-100? it is a candle bomb... i believe It just doesn't look like the one in Lo:FC
Recommended Posts