Jump to content

Neverending contest (military aviation knowledge)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Why this doesn't surprise me? :music_whistling:

 

Is it British?

 

It is like a rule that I rarely break not to tell the country of origin. I might tell where it isn`t from but telling the country of origin is the second most powerful clue after the company manufacturer :D

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I'm thinking british, and twin-engined. No idea apart from that.

Regards

Fjordmonkey

Clustermunitions is just another way of saying that you don't like someone.

 

I used to like people, then people ruined that for me.

Posted

topol-m

 

this is:

1 - US

2 - jet-powered

3 - twin-engine aircraft

4 - looking at quality of photo, it is 50's or 60's

 

Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft?

...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall)

Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)

Posted (edited)
topol-m

Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft?

 

It`s an experimental aircraft that never entered serial production.

Edited by topol-m

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

The cockpit is far to orderly to be a British product .... and I think you have been sneaky by posting it as a mirror reversal :)

Edited by IvanK
Posted
.... and I think you have been sneaky by posting it as a mirror reversal :)

 

Maybe or maybe not :P Tests of the aircraft were conducted in the 50s.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
topol-m

 

this is:

1 - US

2 - jet-powered

3 - twin-engine aircraft

4 - looking at quality of photo, it is 50's or 60's

 

Was it pre-production or purely experimental aircraft?

1 — No. 2 — Yes. 3 — No. 4 — 1947-1952.

 

Can I give the answer?

Posted

What is this?

 

Su-24 with some bombs under its wings and belly.:)

As for bombs, i can make an educated guess, and say that it's ZB-500s (ЗБ-500)...

...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall)

Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)

Posted (edited)
C'mon, Topol-m, don't go! You know we love you :D

 

Don`t worry I`ll be back in 3 weeks in full power, with 8-10 hard riddles prepared :thumbup:

Edited by topol-m

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
No, it is not ZB-500.

 

677d6f8165e8t.jpg

 

Well, then my guess was not that educated :doh:.

Thing looks pretty much like SAB-250-200. Maybe it is indeed SAB-250-200 or SAB-250T?

...the explanation of the past and the prediction of the future are not different operations, but the same worked in opposite directions, the one from effect to cause, the other from cause to effect. (A. Marshall)

Целенаправленная ложь ... создает своих демонов, искажая все: прошлое, вернее представление о нем, настоящее - в действиях и будущее - в результатах этих действий. (И. Ефремов)

Posted
Well, then my guess was not that educated :doh:.

Thing looks pretty much like SAB-250-200. Maybe it is indeed SAB-250-200 or SAB-250T?

It looks very similar to SAB-250-200, but it's smaller and used for different purpose.

SAB-250-200

Length without fuse — 1492–1500 mm.

Diameter — 325 mm.

Weight — 201 kg.

Weight of illuminating charge — 68,8 kg.

Number of flares — 7.

Burning time of each flare — at least 6 min.

???

Diameter — 280 mm.

Length — 1065 mm.

Weight — 98 kg.

Time of burning — >195 sec.

324997a039a1t.jpg

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...