[PTF]Ali Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 R27-ER has 80 miles (130km) range in real life, I have played 500 plus hours russian planes but i still think and always bugs me that the extended range series of r27 is most underpowered missile in DCS. May be drag ratio is high, Mach 4.5 speed this missile has at high altitude but still it never hit the target. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Pöri Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 R27-ER has 80 miles (130km) range in real life, I have played 500 plus hours russian planes but i still think and always bugs me that the extended range series of r27 is most underpowered missile in DCS. May be drag ratio is high, Mach 4.5 speed this missile has at high altitude but still it never hit the target. High altitude and high speed vs high altitude high speed target!
AeriaGloria Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 They changed a few values a few patches ago, it does better then you might remember from long ago, it still needs the full CFD treatment but atleast the LUA value change is a nice band aid Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com
dundun92 Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 Its definitely underperforming but please stop quoting useless brochure values. They are typically Raero values at imparctically high speeds/altitudes. Use actual useful evidence, such as the R-27E DLZ charts: Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when? HP Z400 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 (i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 24 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg
Pöri Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 R 27ER missiles_data.lua 60000.0, -- дальность ракурс 180(навстречу) град, Н=10000м, V=900км/ч, м 25000.0, -- дальность ракурс 0(в догон) град, Н=10000м, V=900км/ч, м 25000.0, -- дальность ракурс 180 град, Н=1000м, V=900км/ч, м R 27ET missiles_data.lua 58000.0, -- дальность ракурс 180(навстречу) град, Н=10000м, V=900км/ч, м. 20000.0, -- дальность ракурс 0(в догон) град, Н=10000м, V=900км/ч, м. 24000.0, -- дальность ракурс 180 град (навстречу), Н=1000м, V=900км/ч, м. I use only in game info and not google armchair expert infos! And the pictures, you fly head on vs Mig 31 3000/h, MiG 31 no reaction the shot, the missile hit the target!
dundun92 Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 That is NOT the actual capabilities of the missile, thats simply what the DLZ is programmed to show. I can edit that and change what the DLZ shows but the missile itself is unchanged. Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when? HP Z400 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 (i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 24 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg
Pöri Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 That is NOT the actual capabilities of the missile, thats simply what the DLZ is programmed to show. I can edit that and change what the DLZ shows but the missile itself is unchanged. Ask Chizh int the Ракеты в DCS topic, DLZ is correct. Many pilot shoot non maneuvering target range and go cry to forum missile is crap.
dundun92 Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 No DLZ is ever 100% correct. Period. Those numbers have nothing to do with the actual missile performance. I can set them to w/e I want and all that changes is the DLZ. IDC what the DLZ is programmed to show, all I care is what the missile is capable of. And if you look at the DLZ chart I posted, and you do some actual tests, you will find that a), the R-27 is indeed underperfoming, and b), the in game DLZ is a bit optimistic, and overestimates the RTR. Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when? HP Z400 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 (i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 24 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg
Pöri Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 No DLZ is ever 100% correct. Period. Those numbers have nothing to do with the actual missile performance. I can set them to w/e I want and all that changes is the DLZ. IDC what the DLZ is programmed to show, all I care is what the missile is capable of. And if you look at the DLZ chart I posted, and you do some actual tests, you will find that a), the R-27 is indeed underperfoming, and b), the in game DLZ is a bit optimistic, and overestimates the RTR. DCS World = game not real life simulator. Not 100% simulating real life and best ever made simulator in the world! :thumbup:
dundun92 Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 DCS World = game not real life simulator. Not 100% simulating real life and best ever made simulator in the world! :thumbup: Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when? HP Z400 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 (i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 24 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg
dundun92 Posted October 1, 2020 Posted October 1, 2020 ...yea ive wasted enough time here :doh: Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when? HP Z400 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 (i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 24 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg
Recommended Posts