Jump to content

The nuclear poll (version 2)  

160 members have voted

  1. 1. The nuclear poll (version 2)

    • Yes, its a part of the arsenal, and potentially at least, a part of modern warfare
      40
    • Yes, it is irresponsible to model a cold war scale battle without this horror of the nuclear card
      4
    • Yes, I want to drop them! (strange love fans - of course such a weapon is unrealistic for the Ka-50)
      5
    • Yes, as a special effect for use as a distant explosion (end campaign cinematics -an unhappy ending)
      2
    • Yes, but only model radiation/crater for the aftermath of a terrorist attack or limited exchange
      4
    • Not now, but maybe in a fixed-wing sequel to the game (ie. it doesn't fit in a helo sim)
      17
    • No, it is too serious a subject (and possibly desensitising or normalising)
      10
    • No, it isn't feasible to be modeled accurately at this time (ie. insufficient hardware power)
      3
    • No, it is not a good use of time and resources (not enough of a priority)
      50
    • No, there are already too many nuclear weapons without us making digital ones
      25


Recommended Posts

Posted

so if someone drops a nuke, we will have people messaging is our awacks dead?

or worst all the airplanes close to the electromagnetic radiation field will get fried, that could bring terrible side effects like scores of -100000000 for killing all the friendlies arround the area.

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

There wasn't really an appropriate answer, so I didn't vote, but: No, because silver bullets are strategic weapons and not appropriate for a tactical sim.

DCS Wishlist: | Navy F-14 | Navy F/A-18 | AH-6 | Navy A-6 | Official Navy A-4 | Carrier Ops | Dynamic Campaign | Marine AH-1 |

 

Streaming DCS sometimes:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...