Ghost79 Posted March 17, 2022 Posted March 17, 2022 Has anyone had the chance to see if there is any noticeable difference in performance of the GAR-8? Todays update states "performance correction". Is the missile oerformance any better? Or it is still as bad as ever? Youtube channel @Flightenvy680
Northstar98 Posted March 17, 2022 Posted March 17, 2022 It was probably this, where the missile took too long to activate. 1 Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 (edited) It looks like they did, indeed, fix the activation time. It's about as useful as a stern gaze, but at least it isn't absolutely useless anymore. Curly is a real G. EDIT: Used it on both the F-5E and F-86F and it actually tracks off the rail, now. Wicked. Edited March 18, 2022 by MiG21bisFishbedL 3 1 Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Recommended Posts