Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Doing tests with AOP, I have realized that it has a significant error.
I attach a track in which I accurately measured the targets, and as you will see in F10 I draw the data,
All three AOP tests failed, I included the last bomb to PP1 to show that the reference point was valid.

Finally, is it useful to indicate at what angle I want the impact?
I have tried various values and it always seems to me that it is 45 degrees.

Thanks

OAP-TEST.trk dcs.log

Edited by uboats
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900KF CPU @ 3.70GHz   3.70 GHz ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING
RAM 128 M.2*2 2T total SSD*3 2.5T total
GeForce RTX 3090   Orion2 HOTAS F-16EX  Saitek Pro Rudder

  • uboats changed the title to [CHK] OAP DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY
Posted
14 hours ago, Colmillo said:

Doing tests with AOP, I have realized that it has a significant error.
I attach a track in which I accurately measured the targets, and as you will see in F10 I draw the data,
All three AOP tests failed, I included the last bomb to PP1 to show that the reference point was valid.

Finally, is it useful to indicate at what angle I want the impact?
I have tried various values and it always seems to me that it is 45 degrees.

Thanks

OAP-TEST.trk 186.65 kB · 1 download dcs.log 1.37 MB · 1 download

 

Hi

Do you have any video to show the issue please?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts

 

| Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD |

| TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn |

Posted

Here you are:

 

 

  • Thanks 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900KF CPU @ 3.70GHz   3.70 GHz ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING
RAM 128 M.2*2 2T total SSD*3 2.5T total
GeForce RTX 3090   Orion2 HOTAS F-16EX  Saitek Pro Rudder

Posted (edited)

try leaving the elevation at zero, if you're offsetting the elevation, wouldn't that try to aim UP another 200ft instead of where it actually is? remember, the whole thing is an OFFSET not a marker - you're offsetting the elevation too. Just put in the differences in elevation, not the actual elevation, because this is an Offset Aiming Point, not a DST.

Edited by Napillo
clarified elevation
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Right!!!!

Thanks Napillo, I just did the test and that was my problem.
I went through Chuck's guide and just realized the following:
"XX ft higher than PP1"
Thank you for your clarification.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900KF CPU @ 3.70GHz   3.70 GHz ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING
RAM 128 M.2*2 2T total SSD*3 2.5T total
GeForce RTX 3090   Orion2 HOTAS F-16EX  Saitek Pro Rudder

Posted

Finally, is it useful to indicate at what angle I want the impact?
I have tried various values and it always seems to me that it is 45 degrees.

C.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900KF CPU @ 3.70GHz   3.70 GHz ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING
RAM 128 M.2*2 2T total SSD*3 2.5T total
GeForce RTX 3090   Orion2 HOTAS F-16EX  Saitek Pro Rudder

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...