Jump to content

Doesn’t TADS have a system to stabilize or hold


Go to solution Solved by BIGNEWY,

Recommended Posts

  • ED Team
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, S. Low said:

Brad (Apache pilot) mentioned he doesn’t like IAT as it causes issues that could lead to friendly fire. His example was you IAT a target, fire at it, and when the ordinance hits target the IAT picks up the flash and sends tads flying off into wild directions. Edit: my point being that you may not want to expect to be relying on this system when it comes out. Try getting comfortable with tads and LMC as they are now

There is nothing wrong with IAT, or using it under the right circumstances. It's a tool that works under some circumstances, and not so great under others. The problem is when people apply an absolute solution to varied sets of conditions or situations.

48 minutes ago, FalcoGer said:

 Thank you. Why couldn't you give me such a simple and straight answer when I asked what IAT does before?

Excuse me? I don't remember responding to a question about IAT by you.

Edited by Raptor9
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man.
DCS Rotor-Head

Posted
7 minutes ago, Raptor9 said:

There is nothing wrong with IAT, or using it under the right circumstances. It's a tool that works under some circumstances, and not so great under others. The problem is when people apply an absolute solution to varied sets of conditions or situations.

Excuse me? I don't remember responding to a question about IAT by you.

 

Yes that makes sense. Everything is a tool to get you through various scenarios 

 

 

Banner EDForum2020.jpg

Posted
11 hours ago, Raptor9 said:

Excuse me? I don't remember responding to a question about IAT by you.

 

No apologies after all.

  

On 3/18/2022 at 7:22 AM, Raptor9 said:

 Not implemented.

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...