heloguy Posted May 4, 2022 Posted May 4, 2022 The M282A1 warhead sticks out of the front of the M261 rocket pod as modeled in the sim. The warhead is roughly the same length as an M151, so it should be recessed in the pod with the umbilical being visible out the front when properly loaded. i9 12900k @ 4.9ghz, 64gb RAM Nvidia RTX 3090 Windows 11 x64 Pimax Crystal VP Force Rhino w/RS F16GRH, Virpil TCS Rotor Plus AH-64 Collective, BRD F1 Pedals, WH Throttle, FSSB R3 w/WH Grip, PointCTRL v2
ED Team Raptor9 Posted May 4, 2022 ED Team Posted May 4, 2022 Technically, it shouldn't even have an umbilical at all. Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man. DCS Rotor-Head
heloguy Posted May 5, 2022 Author Posted May 5, 2022 (edited) If it’s the A1 version, it would. Not sure if that’s correct for the year/version being modeled. The vanilla M282 has no umbilical, and a nominal 6 + or - 4 ms delay. I noticed the rocket mfd page has fuze setting options, which caters to the umbilical, but I’m not sure how proliferated these are in the Army compared to the vanilla MPP. Edited May 5, 2022 by heloguy i9 12900k @ 4.9ghz, 64gb RAM Nvidia RTX 3090 Windows 11 x64 Pimax Crystal VP Force Rhino w/RS F16GRH, Virpil TCS Rotor Plus AH-64 Collective, BRD F1 Pedals, WH Throttle, FSSB R3 w/WH Grip, PointCTRL v2
ED Team Raptor9 Posted May 5, 2022 ED Team Posted May 5, 2022 The M282 (of any version) has never been in use with the regular US Army. However, there are branches in the US that use it, but I've never heard of the A1 version. The fuse settings on the WPN page aren't for the M282 anyway. Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man. DCS Rotor-Head
heloguy Posted May 5, 2022 Author Posted May 5, 2022 4 minutes ago, Raptor9 said: The M282 (of any version) has never been in use with the regular US Army. That’s what I thought, which if that’s the case, the more common version without selectable fuzing should probably be what’s simulated (as you said, no umbilical). Either way, whichever version ED decides to keep with the module, the MPPs shouldn’t stick out of the front of the pod. i9 12900k @ 4.9ghz, 64gb RAM Nvidia RTX 3090 Windows 11 x64 Pimax Crystal VP Force Rhino w/RS F16GRH, Virpil TCS Rotor Plus AH-64 Collective, BRD F1 Pedals, WH Throttle, FSSB R3 w/WH Grip, PointCTRL v2
heloguy Posted May 7, 2022 Author Posted May 7, 2022 (edited) See the link below for a rendering of each warhead. You can see that the M151 and M282 are very similar in length. The M282 actually looks a bit shorter. The rockets are loaded and seated all the way to the rear of the pod no matter which type is loaded, so it stands to reason that the M282 would be recessed the same as the M151. Hydra 70 Rocket with Warheads - 3D Model by Akela Freedom (renderhub.com) Here's another comparison: The right most is an M282 (without umbilical, so not an A1 variant), the 5th from the right is an M151, and just for comparison, the 3rd from the left is an M229. Edited May 7, 2022 by heloguy 1 i9 12900k @ 4.9ghz, 64gb RAM Nvidia RTX 3090 Windows 11 x64 Pimax Crystal VP Force Rhino w/RS F16GRH, Virpil TCS Rotor Plus AH-64 Collective, BRD F1 Pedals, WH Throttle, FSSB R3 w/WH Grip, PointCTRL v2
heloguy Posted December 17, 2022 Author Posted December 17, 2022 Any update to this? Still notice MPPs stick out of the pod when they shouldn’t. i9 12900k @ 4.9ghz, 64gb RAM Nvidia RTX 3090 Windows 11 x64 Pimax Crystal VP Force Rhino w/RS F16GRH, Virpil TCS Rotor Plus AH-64 Collective, BRD F1 Pedals, WH Throttle, FSSB R3 w/WH Grip, PointCTRL v2
Recommended Posts