Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Yes though I imagine the lacking EW environment has something to do with that.

IRL, the SON-9 is a simple (basically WW2 tech) radar using conical scanning and pulse ranging. It should be an easy target for deception jamming (both range gate pull-off and inverse con-scan - both are staple DECM techniques that numerous jammers in DCS should be able to employ), breaking the radar's track or otherwise spoofing the radar with false angle and range information.

I'm not sure how powerful the radar is, but it should also be pretty susceptible to noise jamming and I don't think it has an angle-only tracking function (even if it does, it wouldn't be that useful without ranging).

Edited by Northstar98
  • Like 2

Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

Posted
On 8/9/2022 at 4:10 PM, Northstar98 said:

Yes though I imagine the lacking EW environment has something to do with that.

IRL, the SON-9 is a simple (basically WW2 tech) radar using conical scanning and pulse ranging. It should be an easy target for deception jamming (both range gate pull-off and inverse con-scan - both are staple DECM techniques that numerous jammers in DCS should be able to employ), breaking the radar's track or otherwise spoofing the radar with false angle and range information.

I'm not sure how powerful the radar is, but it should also be pretty susceptible to noise jamming and I don't think it has an angle-only tracking function (even if it does, it wouldn't be that useful without ranging).

 

i agree. i think it may also have to do with the tracking not being implemented correctly. i'd assume that the SON-9 tracking would be reckognized by RWR, which right now it does not. hopefully it will come with the next update...

My improved* wishlist after a decade with DCS ⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟

*now with 17% more wishes compared to the original

Posted
2 hours ago, twistking said:

i agree. i think it may also have to do with the tracking not being implemented correctly. i'd assume that the SON-9 tracking would be reckognized by RWR, which right now it does not. hopefully it will come with the next update...

Yeah should show up as an 'A' on most RWRs that we have and they should be able to tell when it's in acquisition and when it's in track.

Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...