Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Wired is better period; better speed, reliability, security - it is less convenient than wireless. As with everything, if you buy crap hardware you'll get crap performance.

 

But wired will always out-perform wireless as there's no interference to deal with, no channel hopping to do, and no noise (by comparison). It will also not cause you to get NAS ;)

 

What interference GG Tharos? Even my microwave doesn't interfere with my wireless connection and I dont hop channels I'm permantley on one channel. I have NAS to stream my music and films to my TV's and stereo's upstairs and downstairs without having to be at my computer or have it switched on. Also most of my devices are networked in peer to peer I can send music from one stereo to the other and vice versa without a PC now try doing that with a cabled network without a great big birds nest. Below is a sample of my Admin log. Does a cabled network have a built in firewall and adblocker with anti DOS protection running independently of the computer freeing your computer of valuble CPU cycles? Let's see a computer to computer ethernet network be as versatile as mine.

 

Sat, 2000-01-01 00:00:48 - Initialize LCP.

Sat, 2000-01-01 00:00:48 - LCP is allowed to come up.

Sat, 2000-01-01 00:00:55 - CHAP authentication success

Sat, 2000-01-01 00:01:00 - Send out NTP request to time-g.netgear.com

Fri, 2009-01-30 20:45:10 - Receive NTP Reply from time-g.netgear.com

Fri, 2009-01-30 20:44:09 - Router start up

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:00:45 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52306 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:00:46 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52309 Destination:annymegabetavip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:00:46 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52310 Destination:annymegabetavip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52428 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52430 Destination:annymegabetavip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52432 Destination:annymegabetavip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:04:31 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52499 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:04:31 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52505 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:04:31 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52509 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:04:31 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52513 Destination:ew-in-f127.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:04:32 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52521 Destination:http://www.qksrv.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:05:06 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52559 Destination:http://www.qksrv.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:05:06 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52561 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:05:07 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52563 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:09:02 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52720 Destination:ey-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:09:17 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52749 Destination:ey-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:09:18 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52767 Destination:ey-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:09:19 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,52776 Destination:ey-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:18 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53706 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:18 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53710 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:18 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53712 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:19 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53714 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:19 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53716 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:33:19 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,53718 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:51:36 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54393 Destination:gv-in-f166.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:51:37 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54397 Destination:ukmegaadvip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:51:37 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54398 Destination:ukmegaadvip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:51:38 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54402 Destination:ukmegaadvip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:51:38 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54406 Destination:ukmegaadvip1.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 21:58:38 - Administrator login successful - IP:192.168.0.2

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:13 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54905 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:13 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54911 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:13 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54913 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:13 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54915 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54917 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54919 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:15 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54921 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:16 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54925 Destination:gv-in-f164.google.com,80 - [bLOCK]

Fri, 2009-01-30 22:03:19 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,54935 Destination:annymegaadvip3.doubleclick.net,80 - [bLOCK]

Edited by Vault

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I guess you missed the Johny Mnemonic reference ... s'ok ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted
I guess you missed the Johny Mnemonic reference ... s'ok ;)

 

lol GG what the hell are you on about. :lol: I'm lost.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

lots of good experiences, but I'm leaning away from wireless as a personal choice. I'm looking closely at NetGear's Powerline series. Would someone please look this over and offer an opinion? It looks like a simple solution.

thanks!

Flyby out

(d'oh!!! here's the link to the product line page)

http://www.netgear.com/Solutions/HomeNetworking/PowerlineNetworking.aspx

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted

will do

 

good advice, Acedy. I'm always interested in return policies, as a matter of doing business. Other than that, any opinion about the device itself or the concept of it? Anyone? :)

Flyby out

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted

great feedback GS2! Any drawbacks at all with regards to online gaming? It really sounds like the perfect solution for me. Secure enough. I can place my gaming pc in any room now (once I can buy it),and I don't have to drip and snake wires. Also, can you give a bit more info about how your modem is connected to the adapter? My modem has a USB connection that is unused.

thanks!

Flyby out

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted
[or porn]

may you get your just desserts in Paradise: a 72 year old virgin!:D

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted

No cheese and onion crisps as far as I know. But you know what? I'm sure someone here in the USA sells them in some form. If a buck can be made selling them here, they're here.

Flyby out

I guess you can floss with a 72 year old virgin, get that cheese out and drive her crazy at the same time. eh?

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted

what's in the bag?

 

I like your style, CE. it's a little odd, a little twisted, but good clean fun! :D The chips look good though! ;)

Flyby out

  • Like 1

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted
great feedback GS2! Any drawbacks at all with regards to online gaming? It really sounds like the perfect solution for me. Secure enough. I can place my gaming pc in any room now (once I can buy it),and I don't have to drip and snake wires. Also, can you give a bit more info about how your modem is connected to the adapter? My modem has a USB connection that is unused.

thanks!

Flyby out

 

I know you're waiting on a reply for something else, but I just had a quick google for 'powerline adapters' and it seems that Netgear are monopolising Google searches lol, that was all there was on the first page.

 

I found this, though i'm sure you'll have seen similar (this is the UK version). It has a benchmark for the Netgear one, as well as a couple of others.

 

http://www.trustedreviews.com/networking/review/2007/01/25/Netgear-HDXB101-Powerline-HD-Ethernet-Adapters/p1

 

I hought it was interesting that it mentioned a Panasonic version with 'more features' that actually cost less. Some seem to have AV features (like Belkin's), and it's probably worth getting those, seemed only about £20 more.

 

I'm feeling a bit stung now for using Wireless N1 lol. On the other hand you'll need a decent router anyway to plug the adapters into - so make sure you see what speed HD streaming videos at and match that (might futureproof things a little bit).

 

powerline does look like a winner though, plus it's just the sort of thing you can get dirt cheap on eBay (BNIB).

Too many cowboys. Not enough indians.

GO APE SH*T

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...