Jump to content

Update on APG-68v5 Whitepaper


Go to solution Solved by NineLine,

Recommended Posts

Posted

+1000

There are a lot of issues with the current radar simulation that are completely unrealistic and goes against the fundamentals of how radar works in real life. The white paper would really clarify what level of fidelity we should expect from the AN/APG-68v(5) in DCS and which kind of inaccuracies we should and shouldn't report as bugs.

  • Like 4

-Col. Russ Everts opinion on surface-to-air missiles: "It makes you feel a little better if it's coming for one of your buddies. However, if it's coming for you, it doesn't make you feel too good, but it does rearrange your priorities."

 

DCS Wishlist:

MC-130E Combat Talon   |   F/A-18F Lot 26   |   HH-60G Pave Hawk   |   E-2 Hawkeye/C-2 Greyhound   |   EA-6A/B Prowler   |   J-35F2/J Draken   |   RA-5C Vigilante

  • ED Team
  • Solution
Posted

We are still updating and tuning some aspects of our radar, once that is complete I will again bug them about the whitepaper. The good news is the discussion and starting of the whitepaper seemed to have led to some improvements which should be coming soon. Thanks all!

  • Like 15

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...