Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

after shadows flat reset to off for 1 mission its FIX the light problem but slow cockpit loding and no fps or timing improvement

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, rudek said:

6900xt is no bad gpu

but dcs vr  for 4090 only.....

It is a matter of what you give your GPU to do. Even a RTX 4090 can be the bottleneck with extreme settings (and VR).

Do you know your GPU/CPU frame times?

Edited by Tom Kazansky
Posted (edited)

apox 5-6cpu  18-21gpu 56%vram

hi set msaa2 no shadows 40-50fps sirya map f-16

Edited by rudek
Posted
Just now, rudek said:

apox 5-6cpu  18-21gpu 56%vram

 

Ok, thanks. You see: your GPU limits the performance by 3x higher frame times. Even if MT reduces CPU frame times a lot

E.g. even if your CPU frame time was 10 to 18 ms you would not see much worse performance in this example.

Posted

ok thx thatt you pc specs? i'm bulding new pc now(rtx4090) and not close for cpu 7900/7950xt or new x3d any ideas

Posted

I'm on the fence too with building a new PC. I wanted to wait till DCS MT shows what it brings because DCS is the only "Game" that gave me headaches performance wise.

I thought I could avoid a RTX 4090 but so far it seems DCS MT is only/most useful with a huge GPU power. Maybe I start with a 4090 and see what my old i7 8700 can do with it and MT.

But for now I wait and see how MT develops.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...