marcoscosta Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 (edited) Years ago I came here to express my doubt about the future of Kiowa module, now its time to come here to say: Congrats Polychop! The Gazelle was improved so much! You guys showed respect to your userbase! I known, nothing is perfect and I known there always room to improvement, but now, I feel really confident about your work. Looking forward about Kiowa Warrior! Edited February 23 by marcoscosta 2 Computer: Potato Modules: FC3 | M2000C | A/V8B | Viggen | F-5E | F-14B | F-16C | F/A-18 | A-10C | Supercarrier :mad::mad: | UH-1 | MI-8 | Gazelle | KA-50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lau Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 @marcoscosta Thanks for posting this message, I also felt the need to express my gratitude for the improvements on the SA342 and congratulate the Polychop TM for overcoming some of the hurdles that prevented them from doing so. The flight model feels much better, the visual esthetics and wpn config a markt improvement. Looking forward to the future, thank you for your passion and support No customer support or modules in an abandoned state can only mean no further investments from ED’s customers. ED and third party developers are solely responsible for the level of features completeness at which they decide to release their modules. Taking in to account customers feedback as well as finishing the products is paramount. After release, modules should be playable with important essential features completed at very early stages after the release, including bug fixes. ED & partners staffs should grow with the addition of newer modules in order to not diminish the level of customer support or further delay delivery as per the initial sales agreement. The virtual world we fly with our modules is equally important; there is no way around AI, real weather and the earth map. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts