SabreDancer Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 (edited) While watching this video (at 4:10): I began to wonder whether it would be much work to add in an ILS receiver to the F-5. While the late 1980s USAF Aggressor F-5Es modeled in-game may not have been equipped with them, T-38s in the US and F-5Es flown by other nations possessed ILS receivers, and it would add a good deal of flexibility to the plane. US manuals for the F-5E-1 include sections on ILS functionality and equipment, such as at page 1-100 to 1-106 of this manual: https://www.docdroid.com/51orrvC/northrop-f-5ef-flight-manual-pdf#page=111 And changes from the -3 subvariant I have seen do not mention that has changed. As the F-5 needs one more VOR/ILS panel and an added ILS mode to the existing TACAN/DF switch, and VOR/ILS functionality exists within other aircraft made by ED, this may be feasible with low developer workload. The in-game Tiger is currently a fair weather fighter, unable to make a precision instrument approach, and would benefit greatly from all-weather landing capability. Edited March 18 by SabreDancer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=475FG= Dawger Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Non-Precision approach minimums are sufficient for what the F-5 does. 600 ft universally and as low as 400 in some spots If the F-5 needs an ILS, it shouldn’t even bother to sortie. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreDancer Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 I understand non-precision approaches can handle the job well enough in-game, but it's more fun to have one than not. Foreign customers in real life felt the need to have it, after all, as did the US on their T-38s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=475FG= Dawger Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 hours ago, SabreDancer said: I understand non-precision approaches can handle the job well enough in-game, but it's more fun to have one than not. Foreign customers in real life felt the need to have it, after all, as did the US on their T-38s. T-38 is a trainer and required the ILS for the curriculum. I imagine the foreign buyers put the ILS in for much the same reason, proficiency in procedures versus any combat usefulness. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cab Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 13 hours ago, SabreDancer said: The in-game Tiger is currently a fair weather fighter, unable to make a precision instrument approach, and would benefit greatly from all-weather landing capability. For the record, IRL PAR approaches can get a plane not equipped with ILS or GPS down to 200 feet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=475FG= Dawger Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 3 hours ago, Cab said: For the record, IRL PAR approaches can get a plane not equipped with ILS or GPS down to 200 feet. I forgot about PAR/GSR. Those are pretty exciting IRL. TBH, the way the weather works in DCS makes ILS pretty useless. Trying to get ILS mins at one airport is going to sock in all the rest, generally speaking. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cab Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 5 hours ago, =475FG= Dawger said: I forgot about PAR/GSR. Those are pretty exciting IRL. Yes, they certainly could be. My guess is the USAF made the decision PAR’s were sufficient for the F-5 and saved money not installing ILS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreDancer Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 I'd love to have PAR available in DCS, as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=475FG= Dawger Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 hours ago, Cab said: Yes, they certainly could be. My guess is the USAF made the decision PAR’s were sufficient for the F-5 and saved money not installing ILS. Aggressor F-5’s were in the desert and if the equipment is installed it has to be maintained and the pilots have to maintain proficiency. Easy decision to not bother with ILS. And it really isn’t needed. In 15,000 hours flying all over the world in all kinds of weather, I probably needed ILS to see the runway less than 500 times, maybe a lot less than that. Never once in a desert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cab Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 22 minutes ago, =475FG= Dawger said: Aggressor F-5’s were in the desert and if the equipment is installed it has to be maintained and the pilots have to maintain proficiency. Easy decision to not bother with ILS. And it really isn’t needed. In 15,000 hours flying all over the world in all kinds of weather, I probably needed ILS to see the runway less than 500 times, maybe a lot less than that. Never once in a desert. My thoughts exactly. Except to be precise, I believe Aggressor F-5’s were also based in England and the Philippines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now