AbuMuqawama Posted April 5, 2024 Posted April 5, 2024 The Harrier is one of my favorite aircraft and this is of some concern for me. In the worst case scenario that RB leaves the DCS universe, is the AV-8 going to remain being maintained, or are we going to eventually lose the aircraft? Does the promise that the F-15E's development continuing extend to maintenance of other modules by RB?
SloppyDog Posted April 6, 2024 Posted April 6, 2024 42 minutes ago, AbuMuqawama said: The Harrier is one of my favorite aircraft and this is of some concern for me. In the worst case scenario that RB leaves the DCS universe, is the AV-8 going to remain being maintained, or are we going to eventually lose the aircraft? Does the promise that the F-15E's development continuing extend to maintenance of other modules by RB? Is there a promise to keep the F-15 development? From whom? As far as I know if Razbam abandon ship, all of their modules will be affected: F-15E, Harrier, Mirage 2000, etc. If ED decides to keep updating and improving would be a nice thing, but I don't believe they'll do that. They've already have their own modules to worry about. So, I don't see any new updates or maintenance being done on the modules we already own. They'll eventually stop working with time. But I also believe that the community will find a way to giving them an extended life. 1
71st_Mastiff Posted April 6, 2024 Posted April 6, 2024 Unfortunately; I had a feeling this would happen given the VEAO fiasco. 1 "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
TLTeo Posted April 6, 2024 Posted April 6, 2024 Post VEAO ED are supposed to everyone's source code, so tbh my expectations is they will keep modules reasonably sort of kind of functional but not really develop or update them. Same deal as e.g. the F-86, F-5 et al. 1
virgo47 Posted April 6, 2024 Posted April 6, 2024 F-86 and F-5 were developed by Belsimtek that was more or less ED branch. There is no similarity to the current situation. 2 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
nooneyouknow Posted April 13, 2024 Posted April 13, 2024 (edited) where did we hear that RAZBAM was bailing on DCS? N/M, found it. Too bad, I like their modules. I'll never buy anything from RAZBAM (or whatever name they change to in the future) for any other product, ever, if this is the case. Hope they figure it out. Ready to buy the Mig-23 (need that and the 17 to finish my MiG collection) as soon as released, bought every other module of theirs. Would be sad. But I don't like being used as leverage by anybody, for any reason. Bah, politics....'aint got time for that. Gonna enjoy the modules while I can. Edited April 13, 2024 by nooneyouknow
Recommended Posts