Mac D Posted Friday at 09:47 AM Posted Friday at 09:47 AM (edited) I'm not sure if it's actually wrong on the map, or my screwing up somewere : So if some one else would have some time to check, it would be very appriciated. I'm using history data, found on the internet, to (try) and figure out were units were stationed in Germany : the who and were etc. So I found some coordinates of bases around Fulda gap, yet they aren't on the map so I'm just putting a icon in that position. The thing is : The whole positioning feels off to me. For instance, if you check the coordinates for Sickels Army Airfield ( aka Fulda airfield) the coordinates of the "real" airfield and the airfield on the map, there's a 2,9+ Nm difference Ludendorff Kaserne is in the middle of nowhere , north of Fulda, over the East German border in , well East Germany. McPheeters Barracks in the middle of a village at the outskirt of Fulda. Edited Friday at 09:47 AM by Mac D 1
buur Posted Friday at 12:53 PM Posted Friday at 12:53 PM Also have the feeling that the map isn't really alligned. 1
Rick Mave Posted Friday at 01:48 PM Posted Friday at 01:48 PM 54 minutes ago, buur said: Also have the feeling that the map isn't really alligned. Historical charts are off by like 10° in the year 1987... 1 Jagdbombergeschwader 35
buur Posted Friday at 02:00 PM Posted Friday at 02:00 PM vor 9 Minuten schrieb Rick Mave: Historical charts are off by like 10° in the year 1987... 10°? That's to much. Germany itself has a elongation under 10° 1
Rick Mave Posted Friday at 02:13 PM Posted Friday at 02:13 PM 11 minutes ago, buur said: 10°? That's to much. Germany itself has a elongation under 10° No, historical charts are off by 10° WITH DCS's historical change in magnetic deviation for that time. Assuming that ED put in the correct deviation for that year (if that is their responsibility for the sim, Idk), then the Ugra media map is off by 10° for charts from the year I put in to the sim when creating my mission. 2 Jagdbombergeschwader 35
Mac D Posted Friday at 02:48 PM Author Posted Friday at 02:48 PM 33 minutes ago, Rick Mave said: No, historical charts are off by 10° WITH DCS's historical change in magnetic deviation for that time. Assuming that ED put in the correct deviation for that year (if that is their responsibility for the sim, Idk), then the Ugra media map is off by 10° for charts from the year I put in to the sim when creating my mission. That would explain a lot, thanks 1
drPhibes Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago First of all, map coordinates are geographic, not magnetic, so magnetic declination has nothing to do with coordinates being wrong. The magnetic heading of a runway changes, but the coordinates don't. I did a comparison of some landmarks in the mission editor and Google Earth, and they are all pretty much spot on (within a fraction of an arcsecond in most cases): Spandau Citadel, Berlin: Google Earth: N 52°32'27.69" E 13°12'45.51" Mission editor: N 52°32'27.63" E 13°12'46.49" Bridge near Hamburg Planetarium: Google Earth: N 53°35'28.36" E 10°01'29.58" Mission editor: N 53°35'28.35" E 10°01'30.16" Mainspitze, west of Frankfurt: Google Earth: N 49°59'37.29" E 8°17'38.38" Mission editor: N 49°59'36.82" E 8°17'38.94" Neues Rathaus, Hannover: Google Earth: N 52°22'01.74" E 9°44'14.37" Mission editor: N 52°22'01.98" E 9°44'14.67" Fulda airfield: Google Earth: N 50°32'31.32" E 9°38'20.91" Mission editor: N 50°32'33.14" E 9°38'19.03" 2 1
Volator Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Correct. Visual Reporting Points that I placed based on RW coordinates are also in the correct locations. 1 1./JG71 "Richthofen" - Seven Eleven
Mac D Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 9 hours ago, drPhibes said: First of all, map coordinates are geographic, not magnetic, so magnetic declination has nothing to do with coordinates being wrong. The magnetic heading of a runway changes, but the coordinates don't. I did a comparison of some landmarks in the mission editor and Google Earth, and they are all pretty much spot on (within a fraction of an arcsecond in most cases): Spandau Citadel, Berlin: Google Earth: N 52°32'27.69" E 13°12'45.51" Mission editor: N 52°32'27.63" E 13°12'46.49" Bridge near Hamburg Planetarium: Google Earth: N 53°35'28.36" E 10°01'29.58" Mission editor: N 53°35'28.35" E 10°01'30.16" Mainspitze, west of Frankfurt: Google Earth: N 49°59'37.29" E 8°17'38.38" Mission editor: N 49°59'36.82" E 8°17'38.94" Neues Rathaus, Hannover: Google Earth: N 52°22'01.74" E 9°44'14.37" Mission editor: N 52°22'01.98" E 9°44'14.67" Fulda airfield: Google Earth: N 50°32'31.32" E 9°38'20.91" Mission editor: N 50°32'33.14" E 9°38'19.03" Your right. Magnetic declination effects compass use, yet it won't change map coordinates. (I really wasn't awake yesterday) Still doesn't explain why I'm seeing a 2,9Nm/5km difference between coordinates from internet for Ludendorff Kaserne/Downs Barracks, Sickel Army Airfield (Fulda airfield) and some other barracks, to what the coordinates are on the Cold War map. I'll check again tommorrow, had my head stuck in Mission Editor the whole day. I'm quit close to going full brain dead. Edited 4 hours ago by Mac D
drPhibes Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Both the airfield and the barracks are in their correct locations: null 2
Mac D Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 11 minutes ago, drPhibes said: Both the airfield and the barracks are in their correct locations: null Okay, I belief you So somewhere I made a mistake ...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now