Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, Minsky said:

 

I wouldn't trust Wikipedia on that without cross-checking with other sources.

https://missilethreat.csis.org/defsys/pantsir-s-1/

 

Appreciate your respectful assumption, however:

https://armamentresearch.com/russian-96k6-pantsir-s1-air-defence-system-in-ukraine/

 

Quote

"57E6 missiles have a maximum range of 20 kilometres and maximum altitude of 15 kilometres"


 https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/exclusive-technical-review-pantsir-sm-the-latest-generation-in-russias-air-defense-system

 

Quote

"This is a significant improvement over the Pantsir-S1, which could only engage targets at a range of 1,200 to 20,000 meters (1.2 to 20 kilometers) and at altitudes of 15 to 15,000 meters"



06:40


 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Max107 said:

Appreciate your respectful assumption, however:

Yeah, and also:

https://www.deagel.com/weapons/57e6-e/a000921

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/pantsyr.htm

Do we have any confirmed hits at 15 km?

Because all these sources - both yours and mine - are just making assumptions and educated guesses without citing anyone in particular or referencing any hard data.

Seems like the author (Currenthill) went with the more conservative numbers.

Dima | My DCS uploads

Posted

The 15km figure might be the theoretical best case from some marketing materials, 10km is probably more realistic against a possibly maneuvering target. Remember that aside from the missile's kinematics, a SAM crew would not engage anything at the very edge of its envelope, because even a small maneuver could take the target out of it, thrashing the missile. Or, look at it that way: if the missile is good up to 15km max, then launching at 10km at most will ensure it won't be evaded by simply zooming up.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Minsky said:

Yeah, and also:

https://www.deagel.com/weapons/57e6-e/a000921

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/pantsyr.htm

Do we have any confirmed hits at 15 km?

Because all these sources - both yours and mine - are just making assumptions and educated guesses without citing anyone in particular or referencing any hard data.

Seems like the author (Currenthill) went with the more conservative numbers.

Keep posting links to various websites is not an answer but a guess game, surly not better than wikipedia..
thank you for your effort of trying answering anyway👍

47 minutes ago, Dragon1-1 said:

The 15km figure might be the theoretical best case from some marketing materials, 10km is probably more realistic against a possibly maneuvering target. Remember that aside from the missile's kinematics, a SAM crew would not engage anything at the very edge of its envelope, because even a small maneuver could take the target out of it, thrashing the missile. Or, look at it that way: if the missile is good up to 15km max, then launching at 10km at most will ensure it won't be evaded by simply zooming up.

How many targets can actually maneuver effectively enough above 30,000ft?
Maybe you're right about the marketing thing..

Still would love to get an answer from ED or [CH] just to know the actual reason:)
 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Max107 said:

How many targets can actually maneuver effectively enough above 30,000ft?

Just about anything powered by jets, if going reasonably fast. Many aircraft we have can go up to 40kft. It doesn't take much to thrash a missile launched at the very edge of its kinematic profile. Literally any change will do. That the missile can be launched straight up and get up to 15km doesn't mean that it'll be left with enough energy for a meaningful endgame. It's just like range figures from marketing brochures, which are either flyout range or even worse, range against a target closing at supersonic speeds.

Edited by Dragon1-1
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:

Just about anything powered by jets, if going reasonably fast. Many aircraft we have can go up to 40kft. It doesn't take much to thrash a missile launched at the very edge of its kinematic profile. Literally any change will do. That the missile can be launched straight up and get up to 15km doesn't mean that it'll be left with enough energy for a meaningful endgame. It's just like range figures from marketing brochures, which are either flyout range or even worse, range against a target closing at supersonic speeds.

just wanna clarify that my core question in this post refers to the absolute ceiling point of the engagement dome of the system (SA22 in this case).
I'm not talking about being "max ceiling + 5miles away", but flying directly over the dome of the Pantsir.


With that said, discussions about jet capabilities with no details of the mission/threats/goals is not relevant..
Not many jets can preform good above 30k ft when carrying 'stuff' on their wings.


 

 

Posted

The S2 will engage - I've had to climb out above Angels 40 numerous times even when within the outer limits of their engagement envelope. Once I do, the missiles will lose inertia and fall away. At 30K its a little too close for comfort - too slow and I'm toast. End of the day, Pantsirs are better deployed as point defence systems if I understand correctly.

Posted

Maximum target altitude according to the ingame files for the Pantsir is defined as 15'000m.

If it doesn't engage you when you are within that altitude, you are probably out of reach for the missile due to distance, speed and vector.

  • Like 1
Posted

After digging deeper into Russian-speaking sources, it turned out that only the first generation of Pantsirs (pre-2006) had this 10 km altitude limit (or 8 km when using the 9M335 missile).

Later model, partially funded by UAE, has better radar, so the altitude cap was bumped to 15 km. At least according to the official manufacturer's spec sheet.

Dima | My DCS uploads

Posted
3 hours ago, razo+r said:

Maximum target altitude according to the ingame files for the Pantsir is defined as 15'000m.

If it doesn't engage you when you are within that altitude, you are probably out of reach for the missile due to distance, speed and vector.

It never stopped most other SAMS in DCS from engaging you, especially when encouraged with triggers/waypoint actions.

Our in-game 57E6 missile have more than enough energy to reach 12 km when launched at max range. And it reliably reaches 15 km when launched from shorter distances.

So why the unit doesn't even attempt to track targets above 10 km is a mystery.

Given the missile's erratic in-flight behavior, and that it can even magically increase the speed shortly before ehxausting its energy, I'd say something is either bugged or requies further tuning.

Dima | My DCS uploads

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...