bloomstomb Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 Whats the difference between the 2? I do ground, it takes me to t=4.0.0.8 I do inflt it goes to 1.4. 1.0 I can switch on eac when either one is completed, as well as NAV. But inflt seems much easier and takes shorter time to align (i think).. So whats the drawback?
PhiXX Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 With a lower t value you will experience loss of accuracy compared to t=4.0.0.8. I don't know whether or not the reduced accuracy is modeled
bloomstomb Posted May 10, 2011 Author Posted May 10, 2011 Well Im not sure if this is related, but I am flying over turkey atm (quite far from georgia) and at some point eac just turned off, I get CADC failure , and INS has a fom of 6 now. I cant even turn on EAC. Aligning doesnt fix it either.
Druid_ Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 This is INS accuracy, you still have your GPS providing your NAV data. If the GPS fails then position updates will revert to INS position. i7-7700K : 16Gb DDR4 2800 Mhz : Asus Mobo : 2TB HDD : Intel 520 SSD 240gb : RTX 2080ti: Win10 64pro : Dx10 : TrackiR4 : TM Warthog : ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
bloomstomb Posted May 11, 2011 Author Posted May 11, 2011 This is INS accuracy, you still have your GPS providing your NAV data. If the GPS fails then position updates will revert to INS position. So that would make it impossible to get eac to work?
GGTharos Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 No, but your CADC failing would, IIRC. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Recommended Posts