Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did a dry run and we like it but we did have some issues with two guys in the same flight group having different waypoints.

 

Another issue was Senaki, being such a large airfield, but lacking both ILS and Tacan, we were limping back home with no navigation on either one of us... landing was rather interesting... after 30 minutes of trying to find the airfield through that damn fog that is hahaah.

 

 

So we are editing out the tankers, since its causing people to crash (some known bug with radio frequencies or some BS), and changing some waypoints and what not, but keeping the mission pretty much the same and flying it with some people hopefully this week.

 

 

If it all looks good, then we shall post the video up for you here. Nice job on it man!

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the feedback. Always great to hear from people , good or bad. Takes a long time to put together a miz like this.

 

The two guys in the same flight have slightly different waypoints as they have different initial targets. Its in the brief. 1 Aircraft targets ammo dumps and other targets AD units. Of course, if you want to run this differently then thats great as not everyone will agree with my thoughts on how the mission should be executed.

 

Ref Senaki

 

 

There are other airfields that do have an ILS and the Weather message gives you the information required. The only problem may be fuel in which case the tanker should be in the Senaki overhead holding for a top up unless you edit it out. In short, DIVERT. I found it incredibly hard to impossible to land at Senaki in that weather, which is fine as that's the point.

 

 

If you take the tanker out then increase fuel in tusk flight to 8000lbs. Hopefully 1.2.3 will be released soon and this won't be necessary.

 

Look forward to the Video!

Edited by Druid_

i7-7700K : 16Gb DDR4 2800 Mhz : Asus Mobo : 2TB HDD : Intel 520 SSD 240gb : RTX 2080ti: Win10 64pro : Dx10 : TrackiR4 : TM Warthog : ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q

Posted

Yeah i didnt read the PDF till later, and I see now what you did.

 

I think what we are going to do is edit TUSK to start with HAWG, and each element will have the same waypoints till the split. Hawgs will go one way, while TUSK goes the other route, we will split up the work load during our brief.

 

 

1.2.3 had no mention of fixing the tanker issue, or it might be a different issue altogether, we wont know till we experiment.

 

 

This wont be up until next week though, so Il report back later. Cheers!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...