Manny Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 muamshai- this thread has been posted at least 50 times on a half dozen forums. Seems to me you could have read it by now yeah? There are a few members of the F4 community who apparently have nothing better to do than insert themselves into posts like this with the sole purpose of insulting the sim & the community as a whole for daring to prefer it. You rarely see that behavior from LOck on pilots who quickly credit the advantages found in F4. People are going to defend themselves & react to immaturity. Get over it. Well put Konkussion. Muamshai, this is not a uinque thread as konkussion stated. If you want to know the difference, requesting opinions will lead you to one conclusion, an intangible opinion about a game. You would certainly receive more valuable information if you were to request approrpiate settings upon which to run LO-MAC. I understand the intent of your thread and your desire but seriously consider owning both products. I have both and I tend to use LO-MAC more. That does not imply one or the other has precedence as I still use both. If you want to know for yourself, you should consider investing in LO-MAC.
Guest EVIL-SCOTSMAN Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 Most of us fly Russian planes?? Nonsense but I can bet all of you F4 guys fly Falcons ;) LMAO :p
S77th-konkussion Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 Exactly. Get them both if you need to. No one is requiring you to pick just one. At least-not here. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
Woodstock Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 Exactly. Get them both if you need to. No one is requiring you to pick just one. At least-not here.I´d rather even encourage you to buy both. Both are real bargains since from both you get not hours but years:icon_excl of deep, immersive gaming pleasure. They really shine when it comes to longevity. Both specialize in certain areas of military flightsimming as you already read often enough. Having them both you can choose between them on a daily basis according to what mood you´re in. Futhermore, the two are the ONLY two credible approaches to contemporary mil-fighterjet-simming since 1998! Supporting the neglected genre in general by spending a total amount of $70 for both sims would be a wise idea if you like those games and wish to see anything new in the future... "For aviators like us, the sky is not the limit - it's our home!"
The Beast Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 muamshai- this thread has been posted at least 50 times on a half dozen forums. Seems to me you could have read it by now yeah? There are a few members of the F4 community who apparently have nothing better to do than insert themselves into posts like this with the sole purpose of insulting the sim & the community as a whole for daring to prefer it. You rarely see that behavior from LOck on pilots who quickly credit the advantages found in F4. People are going to defend themselves & react to immaturity. Get over it. yeah cause lock on pilots are so much better than everyone else ok see shit like this is why these post go on. you guys keep taking pop shots at people in gereral instead of the game and wonder why it gets immature sad really oh well enjoy your little fantasy land
Alfa Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 The end.. Ok this thread has turned out like all other on the same topic did in the past. From now on "lock-on vs F4" topics will be closed down immedeatly, so dont start any!. Sorry muamshai, but you will have to find other ways of learning about these sims. - JJ. JJ
Recommended Posts